So, you know they discovered a material named graphene by pulling tape over graphite? Well some very evil people took that name to disguise a virus which takes over the phones of our customers and doesn't let the use our operating system.
It does not take hours to change a law, but it is very quick to ignore a law and mow down a field.
Now, whether the law will prevent them from doing that is a different thing.
Someone would have to notice that they're going to build in a protected area, notify the police and contact them officially to notify the error.
At this point they may still ignore that, then you'd likely have to start a trial. If you're lucky and you start the trial before they mow down the field, they'll likely agree they made a mistake, pay for your lawyer and move to the field besides.
There's no need to change a law to fix something as simple as paying a couple lawyers.
That was 14 hours a day 6 days a week. It was non specialized jobs mostly filled by people getting their first job moving from the farms to the cities. Many people changed job within the first year. 40 hours work weeks were available.
Regarding work safety, factories I visited were quite good, modern equipment and practices. I have seen machinery being used quite commonly which would elsewhere be considered highly specialized.
Not sure about free healthcare, I did not get to need the hospital.
I'm not saying it's the best country in the world, but in general the people I met were happy and enjoyed a good life without many problems.
Are you implying Chinese people do not have good living conditions?
I have been in China only a few months working on the assembly line. Work was long and tough, but the pay was good and they'd give you free housing and food. Plenty other workplaces were available if you wanted to work less hours.
I watched your 2 minutes video. It is very sensationalistic and doesn't really explain anything about how the system works or why it could be problematic.
The speaker is American, not European.
She doesn't address the fact that such a system is already in place and the norm for everyone. As of now it is not a 3 party system but a 4 party system: the two persons involved in the transaction and the two private banks handling the transactions. I don't get how taking out the private banks and having a public institution doing the handling would make the system worse.
It would indeed be worse for private banks, which I guess is why a bank employee may be opposed to it.
Moreover, a video by a person who supported Donald Trump in the elections and opposed COVID lockdown is not very reassuring.
What is in the documentation? I skimmed over and thy don't seem to talk about stopping payments or rationing ones money. They do seem to focus quite a bit on privacy and how to protect user data.
Who is the YouTube video by and why should I care to watch it?
i thought it was the EU to issue and back Euro, not a private bank. Here I'm saying backing the Euro as defining it money and having police that will enforce its validity.
This is a way to track you
How is this worse than a regular bank account, which you're required to have anyway?
Bank decides who can buy what and then
Banks could do that already, they do not. Really doubt that is going to happen as it would strongly undermine the utility of Euro.
Do you have reasons to believe this is going to happen or this is just wishful thinking?
So, you know they discovered a material named graphene by pulling tape over graphite? Well some very evil people took that name to disguise a virus which takes over the phones of our customers and doesn't let the use our operating system.