Skip Navigation

User banner

StreetSoul

@ streetsoul @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
23
Joined
1 mo. ago

Black & white street photography. Leica M10 Monochrom + Ricoh GR IV Monochrome. Street, shadow, patience, imperfect light. streetsoul.me

  • [Critique Wanted] Does the foreground crowd carry this frame or choke it?

    Jump

  • Thanks, that matches what I was testing: the guide and the painting as a shared subject, with the audience acting as a frame. I agree about the painting needing a little more headroom; the top edge feels tight.

  • [Critique Wanted] Does the foreground crowd carry this frame or choke it?

    Jump

  • Fair point. ‘Behind the crowd’ may be the problem here. I wanted the foreground blockage to pull the viewer into the audience, but if it reads more like a barrier, then the frame starts choking itself.

  • [Critique Wanted] Does the foreground crowd carry this frame or choke it?

    Jump

  • Thanks for taking the time to crop it. The portrait crop is cleaner, but I think it loses some of the pressure between the guide, the painting and the audience. The second crop gets closer to what I was trying to test: the guide sitting inside the crowd rather than being isolated from it.

  • [Critique Wanted] Does the foreground crowd carry this frame or choke it?

    Jump

  • Thanks, this is really useful. I was thinking of it less as a portrait and more as a street/museum scene where the guide, the painting and the audience all compete a bit. Your point about the crowd framing the guide without taking over is close to what I was hoping for. The flatter angle may be the real limitation here.

  • Refuge [OC]

    Jump

  • The diagonal light does a lot here, cutting through the heavy concrete and keeping the frame from going flat

  • [OC] Pedestrian Bridge

    Jump

  • The leading lines and hard shadows give the empty walkway a strong, unforced rhythm.

  • Photography @lemmy.world
    StreetSoul @lemmy.world
    OC

    The Ceremony Looks Back

  • Photography @lemmy.world
    StreetSoul @lemmy.world
    Critique Wanted

    Does the foreground crowd carry this frame or choke it?

  • Manannán mac Lir

    Jump

  • What works best in this photograph is the alignment between gesture and light. The statue seems to reach for the sun, almost catching it between the fingers. That small coincidence gives the image its tension.

    The low angle gives the figure weight and authority. The raised arms pull the whole frame upward, while the clouds add drama instead of acting as a neutral background.

    In black and white, the image would probably become stronger and more severe. The photograph is already built on contrast, silhouette, sky, and gesture, so it does not depend heavily on color.

    The main gain would be symbolic force: light against mass, body against sky, hand against sun. The main loss would be the bronze-green texture of the statue and some of the atmosphere in the sky.

    I would keep the highlights around the sun controlled, preserve some detail in the torso, and let the clouds stay dark and textured. Color gives the image atmosphere; black and white would give it gravity.

  • Near the Courthouse

    Jump

  • The black and white works here because it strips the scene of easy signals: no protest colors, no uniform color, no visual comfort. What remains is a compressed mass of bodies, police markings, glass, shadow, and blocked movement. The heavy dark foreground makes the viewer feel slightly outside the event, not fully invited in, which suits the photograph.

    The risk is that the middle of the frame becomes a dense grey knot. But I think that confusion is part of the point: the image is less about one decisive gesture and more about civic pressure accumulating in a narrow space.

    Does the monochrome compression make the scene stronger, or would more tonal separation give the image more bite?

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thanks for your helpfully comments.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thank you, Khannie!

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thanks, I'm rookie here.

  • View from CN Tower

    Jump

  • Nice handling of the tonal range: the dark buildings do not collapse, and the bright ones do not shout too much. That lets the eye move through the image in layers, from the facade-heavy foreground to the softer city in the distance.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Oooh! I'm sorry. Excuse me my wrong formatting, please.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • That distinction makes a lot of sense to me. Game dev starts with fabrication, even when it’s trying to imitate reality. Photography starts with something that was actually there, even if the photographer then bends it through framing, exposure, timing, processing, and all the other tiny crimes we politely call “interpretation.”

    So yes, I agree: photography is not pure reality, because nothing humans touch remains pure for more than five seconds. But it is still anchored to the real. The street existed. The light existed. The cars were there, committing their usual visual crimes. My job was mostly to decide where to stand, when to press the shutter, and how much of that atmosphere to let survive.

    That’s why I like “picture” here too. It feels less like a constructed asset and more like a trace of something that actually happened.> Aha, I can see that connotation of ‘image’ as well, what I was trying to go for was the dichotomy between ‘computer generated/manipulated’ and ‘the camera just did that, might have something to do with the cameraman’.

    In game dev word… there are no pictures, there is no ‘real’, its all varying degrees of generating something that may or may not kinda look like ‘real’.

    Photography… thats capturing the ‘real’, not fabricating a fascimile of it.

    At least thats how I think of the two things. Both certainly complex and potentially quite beautiful, but fundamentally different.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • That’s a great way to put it. I like that space between “was this deliberately pushed into something foreboding?” and “or was the street already doing that by itself?” That’s pretty much the balance I was trying to keep: not over-explaining the mood with processing, just giving the existing tension a little shove.

    Also, thank you for calling it a picture. I agree. “Image” sounds like something trapped in a corporate asset folder. “Picture” still has a pulse.> Yeah!

    So lately I am… dabbling more in colorspaces and such, but from a game dev perspective…

    Basically, I think I understand what you’re saying, technically, its just that the lingo I would use is maybe a bit different… or maybe I don’t actually understand it, technically, lol…

    But I can’t of a way to phrase it more accurately than what you said, and that… yeah, you hit the balance between the factors/methods you’re using perfectly, imo, its …

    …right between ‘is this intentionally colorgraded/balanced to seem foreboding?’ and ‘or is it just actually that the shot itself is framed and composed and lit, naturally, in a foreboding way?’

    Yeah I just really like this… I’m going to call it a picture, not an ‘image’, lol.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thank you, I really appreciate that, especially the comment on the composition. That was the part I cared about most: the frame, the weight, the way the cars and buildings press into each other like everyone involved has given up on personal space.

    And yes, the monitor/phone/print rabbit hole is real. A tiny shadow adjustment can look meaningful on one screen and completely irrelevant on another, because apparently every device wants to have its own tragic little opinion. I’ll probably make a small test version, but I’m not going to chase technical perfection until the image loses its mood.> No problem. Yeah I agree with your approach here too. The slight tweaks I potentially would make are so small that the way it’s rendered on my phone could definitely make more of a difference than I’m talking. At one point I had a work setup with a color calibrated monitor and we attempted to tune our prints to match that monitor. That’s a huge rabbit hole. Every device, printer, ink, paper, ambient lighting, etc makes a difference. So these kinds of tweaks have driven me crazy at times!

    I really like your composition in this shot btw. Should’ve mentioned that earlier, specifically.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thank you, that’s actually very useful. Sometimes a non-photographer’s reaction is the cleanest one, before we start measuring shadows with tiny imaginary rulers like civilized lunatics.

    I may make a slightly brighter test version just to compare, but I’m glad the current one already works as an image.> As a non-photographer, I like it, but it’d be hard to say without an example. I think it looks good now.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thank you, I really appreciate that. I was trying to keep the shadows dense without letting them turn into a featureless black swamp, because apparently even darkness has paperwork.

    I agree: maybe a touch more shadow detail could work, but only a touch. I don’t want to rescue everything from the dark. Some parts of the frame deserve to stay slightly buried.> I think it’s a beautiful shot. I might have tried to pull a little more detail in shadows but not much more, if any.

  • Too much black, or just enough?

    Jump

  • Thanks, that’s reassuring. I wanted the blacks to feel heavy, but not dead. There’s a difference between depth and just throwing a bucket of ink over the frame, though photography forums sometimes pretend that’s a philosophy.

    I may still test the upper tones a bit, but I agree: the shadows keep enough texture and detail to hold the image together.> Most black I see still has plenty of definition, so I don’t think you overdid it.

    Body

  • Photography @lemmy.world
    StreetSoul @lemmy.world

    Too much black, or just enough?