They changed their name to "AJJ" instead of the full previous name. Basically saying Andrew Jackson was a piece of shit and everyone already called them AJJ anyway. That was a loooong time ago now, like maybe a decade.
Removed. Someone else already said this before. Also, please ensure you stick to the stlye guides next time, and be less ambiguous. SO could mean a plethora of things.
No, because then the gains become realized and you'd need to pay taxes. Better to take a low-interest loan out against the assets and pay no taxes, like the meme says.
Elon didn't sell $50B of stock to buy Twitter. He took loans from foreign nationals using stock as collateral.
Not really, though. Maybe that money does something the day the holding is bought, but then it just becomes dead weight or even debt since the company might be eyeing it for a buyback. If I buy a stock for $1k today and in 10 years it's now worth $50k, that $50k isn't being used by the company to produce. It doesn't even exist at all until I decide to sell, at which point I keep the money for myself.
Induction stovetops and ranges are expensive, but induction cooktops are cheap. I've been using this one to avoid my gas range for years now. Heats up faster than gas and it plugs in to a normal 120v outlet. Haven't looked back, except when I absolutely need multiple burners. Maybe I'll buy a second, lol.
If you don't like this comment, post your own. That's how this works, both here and on Reddit. Platform has nothing to do with it, unless it's a closed, invite-only forum. That's the only way you can keep out simple farmers, the people of the land. The common clay of the Earth.
And it's a lifesaver. Even with it, places still try to scam you. I was just in a concert/bar recently that, when asked for water, would give you a $7 can of Liquid Death unless you explicitly specified otherwise. Lots of couples walking around with $14 of water in their hands...
I like that none of my local devices are externally addressable unless an outgoing connection has been established. You can (and should) achieve the same thing with ipv6, but then it's essentially just maintaining a NAT table without the translation piece. I think that makes sense in both protocols.
Ha, yeah that sucks and I'd absolutely hate it if I were behind a CGNAT. But I believe most ISPs don't do that. None of mine ever have. Just like how most ISPs provide you with an ipv6 address range, but not all. Fact is that crappy ISPs can screw up your network no matter what ip spec you're using.
And I've never heard of a business network being behind an ISP controlled CGNAT. A NAT you control can be nice.
Idk man, NAT makes a lot of sense once you get used to it. And it's pretty cozy with its firewall features. And somewhat human readable ipv4 addresses are nice.
KeePass isn't going anywhere. They're also dragging their feet on passkey support, so you might go with KeepassXC.