If services start just blocking Linux, that is really bad for Linux users and adoption rates. It does not matter what apps you personally think are worth sticking with. It will just make Linux worse for everyone.
The point of this article is clear: that these laws are a problem to Linux and everyone even if Linux is left out of the scope.





It seems you did not read the article. I don't see anyone being on the side of these age verification laws. What they are saying is that the laws are bad for Linux and it's users even if Linux was left out of the laws' scope.