I personally hold a Consciousness-Only View, something like nondual Buddhism, and would say that your questions are on the right track but you're understandably trying to reconcile them with the consensus opinion of a materialistic world. Which leads to a nihilistic "this is all a simulation" line of thinking that still runs into the wall of duality - you're still putting an external force out there, acting upon you. As long as you believe that there are goal posts, you can move them indefinitely. It's a simulation within a simulation within a simulation and depending on your inclination, you can put a really depressing spin on it ("I'm being tormented").
But if you aren't actually experiencing life from a nondual angle (as you don't seem to be), the philosophy doesn't mean much. And to experience life with the freedom that comes from not experiencing yourself to be only the things you think you are takes a lot of practice - meditation etc. with a secure and healthy community around you. Unless you get lucky.
Up to you what you want to do with this all though. I only saw the little glimpse of your life that you divulged in the comments and as such I'd say, focus on what is most immediate to you. Get food. Take care of your body. Try to find a real-life community. Occasionally poke at your thoughts about what you VALUE and drill down - do you value the thing you said or do you value what you believe you will get with the thing you said? Make choices in life that help you live more according to your values. Stop spending excessive amounts of time online, especially if all the stories cause you anxiety.
Or you can just join a Buddhist monastery or something. You'll be taken care of and your identity as a second child or an immigrant inherently doesn't matter, but of course you'll be giving up a lot.
It's a balance. Someone brought up the pacific garbage patch. Nitpicking about the existence of the other garbage patches does not detract from the fact that one is being cleaned. Hurrah. However, if the clean up efforts were simultaneously releasing sea-life killing chemicals into the water, then yes that might be something worth bringing up. Understanding what is actually context for any given issue is great. Fluff news in the vein of !orphancrushing@lemmy.world are deservedly picked on. Legitimately good news don't need the have shadows cast on them from issues that aren't relevant. And even if something is somewhat relevant (like the existence of other garbage patches) one can frame it in a way that isn't shitting on the first bit of good news. Like "oh, great, I'm glad to hear this garbage patch is getting cleaned, hope this success inspires efforts to clean up the others too" as opposed to "who cares, there's more".
There are these bell curve people who have surface scratch information about a million things because they spend so much time online, yet they lack the wisdom to know how and when to connect bits of information together.
If there is ever any conceivable way to act as if one has the morally higher ground, 99.9% of people will use it with an Ad Hominem attack to avoid dealing with the actual point of an argument. ESPECIALLY on the internet. No matter what political, academic or just plain nerdy configuration of people you have, no matter what topic they are discussing. If anyone ever catches even the faintest whiff of a position that they think is morally inferior, they will unfailingly disregard any logic, context and relating in favor of demonizing the opponent. Because there is no sugar sweeter to the human mind than thinking themselves morally superior.
Both require very, very stern honesty with oneself and understanding the difference between FEELINGS and NARRATIVES about feelings. You both need to commit to this, and NOT police each other - when one of you sees the other fail, it's on them to translate, not to guilt trip.
(and yes, learning this will initially lead to very stiff and awkward speech, you'll get over it)
Well... it's not unusual in Indian symbolism for eye and vagina to be similar. The third eye can also be understood to be a yoni as in some systems of thought: It originates the perceived world (grossly, grossly, grossly simplified). If this really is kerala, the architect probably knew this.
That said putting the symbolism on a bus station is a bit weird to my mind but eh, why not.
The Alters. It's great!
Nice to see someone tackle ideas around some really deep philosophical questions and make an actually engaging game around them.
The environment forces a change. Nobody is forcing people to use those platforms last I checked. People go in voluntarily and then find new ways to express themselves. Then other people end up adopting the lingo but nobody forced them either. I truly don't see the issue. If it's not corporate, it's some other thing doing some moral posturing that also will force inventing slang so as to avoid some sort of negative consequences.
You could be very right but I doubt powers that be want to take that chance. That said, I do consider AI dangerous in the world of information warfare.
EU can't be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI. Of course it wants to make it possible for European AI devs to have support, like a search index that also conveniently has the potential of favoring information that aligns with EU interests.
I truly do not get why people get so upset about language changing. It's always changing, someone at the right place at the right time says a silly word and suddenly it goes viral or some event makes people adopt some word in an unusual context or whatever. Teens come up with their own lingo (because of course they do, they are kids, they need to develop an identity separate from the older generation) and it lives on. And new language is obviously especially likely to spring when there is a need to go under the radar even a little bit. I think it's fun to watch.
I mean the reason you have to ask is kind of... why
We're in mostly a capitalistic world. Capitalism makes utilitarianism seem easy since it becomes easy to assign a "value" to everything. That kind of thinking quickly gets you to naive cynicism. We're conditioned to think certain things are more valuable than others - mental wellbeing and community have been steadily devalued.
There's a saying "behind every cynic there's a disappointed idealist". We're in a world where a lot of people grew up in a time of amazing technological advancement, but have been bitterly disappointed by how the world is today. These people are now getting to that age where they may have been working the same job for a while (if they got lucky with job security) and they just want to get the job done and not exert any more effort than necessary (since by their experience, it doesn't "pay off").
Let them be them, you do your thing. They don't owe you any kind of behavior really, though it would be expected and polite of them to keep things at professional level of course. You don't owe them either so you don't have to let them bring you down. Don't take it personally though because it really, really isn't.
Obvs just my view. If you really want to know, you can try to just ask what they value and if you can work in a way that aligns with that while not disregarding your own values.
Based on 3rd hand accounts, he’s been steadily losing weight for years and while it was hard to find recent photos at a cursory glance, there are a few where he is noticably skinnier (also the article does mention he looks fitter in a conference call)
They can go to the cops. I get this may not seem ideal to them if they are in fact doing something illegal. And again: giving money to beggars encourages begging -> more human trafficking. It's a very, very direct causation. I rather not get into that.
I personally hold a Consciousness-Only View, something like nondual Buddhism, and would say that your questions are on the right track but you're understandably trying to reconcile them with the consensus opinion of a materialistic world. Which leads to a nihilistic "this is all a simulation" line of thinking that still runs into the wall of duality - you're still putting an external force out there, acting upon you. As long as you believe that there are goal posts, you can move them indefinitely. It's a simulation within a simulation within a simulation and depending on your inclination, you can put a really depressing spin on it ("I'm being tormented").
But if you aren't actually experiencing life from a nondual angle (as you don't seem to be), the philosophy doesn't mean much. And to experience life with the freedom that comes from not experiencing yourself to be only the things you think you are takes a lot of practice - meditation etc. with a secure and healthy community around you. Unless you get lucky.
Up to you what you want to do with this all though. I only saw the little glimpse of your life that you divulged in the comments and as such I'd say, focus on what is most immediate to you. Get food. Take care of your body. Try to find a real-life community. Occasionally poke at your thoughts about what you VALUE and drill down - do you value the thing you said or do you value what you believe you will get with the thing you said? Make choices in life that help you live more according to your values. Stop spending excessive amounts of time online, especially if all the stories cause you anxiety.
Or you can just join a Buddhist monastery or something. You'll be taken care of and your identity as a second child or an immigrant inherently doesn't matter, but of course you'll be giving up a lot.