True, but a lot of his posts are almost definitely written by staff, and I feel like it's very plausible they at least partially use AI to imitate his style. If you scroll through his recent posts, he's made dozens of long ass local election endorsements with redundant points and a very similar style, all ending in " — THEY WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!"
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 112
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 112
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago

Worth noting that you can measure more genetic variation between a few chimpanzees in the same region than all genetic variation in the human race
Humans are a very young species with abnormally low genetic diversity. We have purely surface-level diversity in physical appearance, with natural phenotypes making up a meaningless fraction of our actual genes. And we have high cultural/behavioral diversity because we have extremely high neuroplasticity as children, allowing the brains we're born with to uniquely shapeshift to the environment we're raised in
Chimps even have 4 subspecies in different parts of the world, while all of humanity's subspecies (neanderthals, denisovans, naledi, etc) went extinct. Our subspecies (sapien) has existed for a short 200k years, not enough time to evolve any real differences between us; or really even the most minor group differences when you consider our nonstop migration and group intermixing as an unprecedentedly social species. Chimps existed for millions of years, more than enough time to evolve major biological differences between countless numbers of groups; especially considering groups even across the same forest rarely leave their territory or intermingle with outside groups unless forced (i.e. nowadays from human deforestation). Humans are more or less born the same yet develop vast learned differences, while behavioral differences between chimps is bound to be way more innate