Skip Navigation

Posts
6
Comments
1014
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Unfortunately, I hope at some point this just becomes normal.

  • I talked to some friends and they told me so much about back issues because of chest weight, and I started putting two and two together as to why women usually don't run regularly and things like that and I gained even more respect for when they do.

    It's so cool to see women entering men's spaces and being undeniably good at it.

  • You don't call yourself a Nazi for your open mindedness. Of course you can talk to them to understand their perspective but if someone asks, I call it what it is: a deeply troubling ideology.

  • Should we ask questions if they're clearly rhetorical?

  • First the direct answer: you can't.

    Some more context: there's usually ways to deal with this issue. There's voir dire for example, where you can do a practice run of the questions and answers for a specific witness, or the party can profer (idk if it's spelled correctly) the testimony, giving the judge a general idea of the direct or cross-examination.

    This usually only happens if something goes wrong. It can be things like the lawyer overstepping a boundary by accident, but it's very frowned upon and they can be admonished and sanctioned by the judge.

    For why to do about the "can't put the shit back in the horse", usually the judge gives the jury an admonishment and maybe even a curative instruction right before deliberation, but best case scenario it's been handled in advance and doesn't even happen.

    Basically the idea is to keep the jury "as clean as possible in their decision". Best case they only hear the stuff that's relevant, but any other case you try to tell them to disregard things or remind them what to consider, and you hope they feel duty-bound to uphold this.

    Generally it is understood that juries take their obligation extremely seriously and most of the time they genuinely make an effort to rule out evidence that shouldn't have come in. Of course there are outliers.

  • About to head to a stag party and I am excited and a bit overwhelmed, I just hope I can get through it.

  • Soooo.... Pics?

  • Around 16 with autism and around 24 with ADHD. I got a headstart on other people, though it still is daily work to figure out what that means and slowly get better at humaning.

  • I make dubstep so I feel so this hurts my soul in a one two punch combo.

  • But imagine listening to dubstep though

  • Yeah if you think life is simple just because you fit into that category, boy have I got some news for you. Never assume people's struggles, the world is big and generalizing groups of people is dumb.

  • It really depends on if you think this is a genuine exploit or not. If it is, look up Microsoft's track record on complying with disclosure and make yourself familiar with responsible disclosure guidelines.

    If it's not then you just need to look into the EULA of the specific windows parts affected, so they don't pull your repository. Because that's usually the biggest thing they do if you don't specifically start fights with these companies.

    Generally, you're probably fine. If you want me to look over it I can give you my discord or fluxer or whatever. Not an expert, just a Cybersecurity enthusiast.

  • Guess it takes a shit post to learn biology

  • Sponge? Bacteria? Viruses?

  • I didn't know it was about that Nvidia presentation. I just didn't connect this article to it, but I know of the Nvidia presentation. That explains why this alternative interpretation didn't cross your mind.

  • Yeah I'm 100% sure they are doing this A) for good PR (blender is a beloved app and funding them is awesome) b) to retain communication with the team for easier agent integration later c) to lobby for their AI.

    I can totally understand that it doesn't look great if blender accepts the money.

    I am sure though that blender could probably need the money; open source software is criminally underfunded and those devs need money to survive at the end of the day.

  • That's unrealistic. In the grant scheme of things Lemmy is small. There's not enough activity for bigger criminal activity to occur here yet. Generally, there's a bunch of three letter agencies who could probably get search warrants or permission to go after instance owners, but they'd need to be aware of Lemmy and they'd need a good enough reason to convince a judge. It'll be a while until then. Maybe on mastodon first, we'll see but that's all speculation.

    And should we be concerned? Maybe about those 3 letter agencies, but not about platforms like these, and most definitely not about Lemmy instances.

    As long as we keep defederating from actually scary ones with csam on there, we're more than good.

    Also if this is a rhetoric question with a strong insinuation to get angry at lemmy.world then get bent, I like my Lemmy instances drama-free, thank you.

  • To me the title suggests the dev made the DLSS design intentionally worse, to generate controversy and now he is happy with the result.

    The text actually explains that the devs just heard about the DLSS 5 alterations and were happy people loved the old design so much. Nothing controversial from him, not even intentional new designs.

    Sounds like you got it right at first glance and I didn't. However, often these titles are intentionally misleading as to generate more outrage "you should be mad at the developer for creating controversies and being smug about the outcry". Not a fan of those manipulative tactics in modern journalism or whatever it calls itself currently.

  • And then you add the clickbait back in: 'we got the design right', Resident Evil Requiem Dev backs fans in their backlash against DLSS redesigns

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world

    Do you want the murderer of the UnitHealthcare CEO prosecuted?

  • Dull Men's Club @lemmy.world

    Deciding whether I should eat

  • Boost for Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Ads with full volume?

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world

    Random black screens

  • Boost for Lemmy @lemmy.world

    UI elements not visible on pictures