All the documents relating to this case are on its ICJ webpage
The full text of the operative clause of the Order reads as follows:
“For these reasons,
THE COURT ,
Indicates the following provisional measures:
(1) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within
the scope of Article II of this Convention, in particular:
(a) killing members of the group;
(b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
(d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
[...]
(2) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall ensure with immediate effect that its military does not commit any acts described in point 1 above;
[...]
(3) By sixteen votes to one,
The State of Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip;
[...]
(4) By sixteen votes to one,
The State of Israel shall take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip;
[...]
(5) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall take effective measures to prevent the destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence related to allegations of acts within the scope of Article II and Article III of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide against members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip;
[...]
(6) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall submit a report to the Court on all measures taken to give effect to this Order within one month as from the date of this Order.
omissions by "[...]" are just the names of each judge and whether they approved or dissented.
Any worker has the right to strike. If what is affected is critical infrastructure then the government has to step in on the side of the workers to force a settlement.
Just because you want unlimited flow of treats does not mean laborers should not be able to fight for better working conditions
Ich denke das ist denen scheissegal auf welchen demos Baerbock und Scholz laufen. Warum sollte sie das interessieren oder gar ihre Entscheidung bzgl Parteiverbot beeinflussen?
Why not? If you are looking to diminish someone's right you need a better reason than "I don't like it". If you are looking to restrict someone's rights you need to give a reason not the other way around.
Let me give you an example of what I would think would be a good argumentation. I think we should illegalize circumcision. While this would restrict a parents right to raise their children with the religion of their choosing, circumcision goes against the childs right to be free from bodily harm which trumps the parents right to raise their children in the religion they see fit. The protection of a third persons rights is in my opinion a valid reason to diminish someones right.
Why should your beliefs dictate whether another person has to choose between their religion and job? And why these two things in particular, what about Orthodox Jews, people with a bindi and so on?
Do you have any material reason to discriminate against people like this? Particularly since this discrimination will be felt by minorities more harshly than the rest of the populace.
Nee Alkoholismus ist ziemlich heftig. Kann mir sehr gut vorstellen dass der mal Kapitän war als er noch jung war aber dann abgerutscht ist. Als er dann keine Anstellung mehr fand aufgrund seines Alters oder Alkoholismus ist ihm dann das Geld weggetrocknet. Wäre nicht der erste Seemann dem das passiert. Ziemlich traurige Geschichten das.,.
Kann mir jemand dass mit Harald Krull erklären? Der mann hat halt die Seemännischen Patente die er als Kapitän braucht, wie jeder andere Kapitän auch. Warum ist das so witzig? Ist das weil man es ihm nicht so ansieht? Oder weil man so jemanden nicht im Penny auf der Reeperbahn erwartet?
A prototypic Red-basher who pretended to be on the Left was George Orwell. In the middle of World War II, as the Soviet Union was fighting for its life against the Nazi invaders at Stalingrad, Orwell announced that a “willingness to criticize Russia and Stalin is the test of intellectual honesty. It is the only thing that from a literary intellectual’s point of view is really dangerous” (Monthly Review, 5/83). Safely ensconced within a virulently anticommunist society, Orwell (with Orwellian doublethink) characterized the condemnation of communism as a lonely courageous act of defiance. Today, his ideological progeny are still at it, offering themselves as intrepid left critics of the Left, waging a valiant struggle against imaginary Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist hordes.
Wenn die Bezahlung die einzige Form von Lohn ist und diese nicht dem Wert der geleisteten Arbeit entspricht dann ist sie unfair. Verstehe den Punkt mit "jegliche" Bezahlung nicht.
Ich kann keinen sozialen Markt betreiben also nein. Ich werfe es der Regierung vor. Und was meinst du mit Untätigkeit du hast doch keine Ahnung was ich tue oder lasse?
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)
Full text: Order of 26 January 2024
Individual judge opinions
All the documents relating to this case are on its ICJ webpage