Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
7
Comments
262
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Everything those big corporations do ultimately ends being consumed by we consumers. We can't carry on driving SUVs to buy bottled water in Starbucks and saying it's corporations that need to act for the environment. Yes, structural solutions will always be best, but it's not an either-or situation and we can't cop out of taking actions ourselves by acting as though it is.

  • Deleted

    Running

    Jump
  • I think the problem is that you're not explaining which country you're thinking of, and seem to be suggesting it's the same legal situation everywhere

  • Those are much much higher up, which introduces a lot of signal latency. The Starlink types are low down, which makes the Comms faster (and also means they keep burning up in the atmosphere)

  • Don't ask online strangers for medical advice. Go to a doctor if you're worried

  • Comparison with current excitement about AI is interesting. Look at the language people use to describe the behaviour of LLMs

  • You seem to be suggesting that because some level of risk is inevitable, any level of risk is acceptable. There's a big difference between minimal practical risk and reckless levels of risk, but your construction doesn't capture that with its crude binary of "risk or no driving". We could drive with far less risk, eg enforcing speed limits with technology

  • He's also a figurehead who announces whatever the government of the day tell him to accounce

  • Flipboard sounds a lot like what you're looking for

  • Probably not. This sort of project is used by bad-faith actors, and naive policymakers, to justify not taking urgent action to curtail emissions. There's a good case for saying it would be better if this sort of piffling demonstration didn't exist, because then it would be harder to delay action on emissions

  • Because we have a lot of history. If we're doing an historic festival it would be more specific about the period, not just some homogeneous "past". But that said, such festivals are quite rare anyway

  • There are 7 billion people. How exactly are we going to have a system where they all try to be the highest?

  • Yes! For a moment I seriously was trying to decide if scunting was a word

  • This is not good news. Cramming more cars onto the road means more emissions and more collisions

  • While there are hungry people, we shouldn't be growing crops just to set fire to them

  • I always hoped Wolf of Wall Street would have a sequel

  • I'm a professional researcher and we all use Google Scholar. I've never seen Captchas on there. Are you on Scholar itself, or standard Google?

  • Genuine question: what value does my telemetry contain to them if I've clicked their link maliciously? Isn't it more likely it helps give them a wrong idea of what people interested in Shell look like?

  • In large part because we've offshored all our manufacturing there. They're still our emissions, even if they're happening in China. We can't absolve ourselves that easily