"To Trump's credit, it needs to be said that at least he tried," Ariel Kahana wrote in the Hebrew-language daily Israel Hayom. "His bold willingness to unleash the United States' tremendous firepower on Iran is tens of times preferable over the historic impotence that was shown by all of his predecessors.
"The bottom line is that Iran can and is presenting to the world a victory picture by dint of the very fact that it is still standing. Trump, for the time being, does not have a similar counter-picture of his own to show. That isn't very good news for the Israeli people."
Bloody heck these people need a swift head reboot. Jumping into a preemptive war of choice is not something you execute into without knowing you have an endgame, and alternatives already mapped out (not Trump's strong suit). Further you accept the consequences once you start it, as you can't deflect very well when a solid peace with good economics was at hand before prior.
Good luck with the polls, I hope they reflect the death and hardship this caused.


So the 1950s and the so called nuclear age was driven by older generation in corporation, utilities, and politicians who thought it was the next great age. The next generations were the anti-nuclear movements.
Globalization too in the 90s and 2000s, was corporations of older generation and the next generations thought it was threating and full of shite.
Still, I think your point stands as this also involves creative professionals as well as white collar workers which those didn't.