Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
4
Comments
118
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Who's the kid that comes over an knocks down your sand castle?

  • There is a technical solution: Have cameras sign the raw data recorded from the sensor in situ, which allows you to check if a given video was recorded on a given device. You could even add another layer where the device uploads timestamps, frame hashes and location data to a blockchain (finally a usecase!) to pin it to a certain place and time. Sure, all of this can be circumvented with enough effort, but it will make it much harder. Especially if a video can be pinned to a place, you can verify if it matches that scenery.

  • Every device has a headphone jack if you push hard enough.

  • Fully agreed. But harder to sell unfortunately :(

  • The right license in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So, wake up, Mister Torvalds. Wake up and... smell the ashes...

  • I guess this is supposed to be taken as a bleak joke but it won't be over soon. We all will likely experience a direct hit to our quality of life. If you're poor, your survival will get harder. If you have or want children they will have fundamentally worse lives, compared to what we experienced so far. This can go on for decades or centuries, depending on how much we can stsill fix and what tipping points occur.

    So yeah, hope that is some motivation to change something. Or at least shout at some people. :)

  • I also enjoy shouting "Wololo" at other people's computers, only to have them boot into Linux unexpectedly.

  • I want to love my FP3 but it loves to crap out by being slow or just crash prone. I replaced my camera because it accumulated dust behind the lense, because it is replacable.

    ... still wouldn't buy any other phone, it works well enough in all aspects and is a bit like the slightly crappy car you still love <3 Next one will be a FP5 :)

  • Fully agreed. We are all on the internet, where you can find a link to questionable content anytime. Moderation is usually limiting those links, but (unless your ISP is blocking sth) nobody is cut off from said content. It is just harder to find, and there is no "right" to find content easily.

  • Something something landed gentry ;)

    • Cannot convert baby carrot to Carrot
    • Index 7 is out of bounds for egg container
    • Boiling water suddenly turns totally black and opaque due to a bug in the bubble shader
  • Klingt so als sollten wir Radfahren nur auf abgetrennten Radwegen erlauben, die wir dann aber nicht bauen.

  • So they want to drive down wages and/or failed at long term management of their workforce structure. Why are the repeated failures of management types across all industries not named more directly?

  • Turns out it exists in gdb, although in a limited scope!

     c++
        
    #include <iostream>
    
    int main() {
      int a = 0;
      std::cout << "before: " << a << std::endl;
      a += 1;
      std::cout << "after: " << a << std::endl;
      return 0;
    }
    
      

    Compile with g++ -g and run gdb a.out

     
        
    (gdb) run
    before: 0
    after: 1
    [Inferior 1 (process 10976) exited normally]
    (gdb) break 1
    Breakpoint 1 at 0x5555555551d5: file main.cpp, line 6.
    (gdb) run
    Breakpoint 1, main () at main.cpp:6
    6	  int a = 0;
    (gdb) jump +3
    Continuing at 0x55555555521b.
    after: 0
    [Inferior 1 (process 10979) exited normally]
    
      

    See here for documentation

  • One of the best weapons against this is probably having a well-formulated idea about this, which can effectively be communicated to people who are not in the loop. For example Right to Repair presents a kind of "our high quality device with schematics vs their short lived crapware". Good naming helps too. I suggest "Fediverse vs Corponet"

  • What Usenet provider are you using?

  • Interesting idea! Although it seems to be very invasive. If it really detours code the breakpoint suddenly modifies execution. Most debuggers seem to bebuilt as pure measurement tools. And i have the feeling for good reason: Understanding when the code will be executed is a big part of debugging. And the need to detour suggests the code is poorly debuggable.

  • /r/jesuschristre- ... /c/jesuschristlemmy