I kind of think there should be a constitutional amendment preventing legislatures from passing laws restricting the rights on a protected class. Like men can't vote on laws which take rights away from women. Or straight people can't pass laws banning LGBTQ material.
Wikipedia typically summarizes the cited source. LLMs don't use the language in the source to write a summary. It comes up with its own language. LLM cited text usually gets removed for uncited claims because the claims just aren't in the reliable source.
Bill Clinton passed a law defining marriage between a man and a woman. And you are saying this is an example of progress made by a centrist candidate. Isn't this the law doing the opposite, here?
And you are saying that Gavin Newsom, who has spoken out against trans rights, can do something similar? Like assuming he does the same thing, like pass a "Defense of gender" bill to allow other states to not recognize gender transitions.
I think the argument is that voting for status quo candidates aren't actually getting us those things, either. And any small incremental gains are quickly reverted the next time republicans are in power.
It's kind of sad that people are so motivated by jealousy. Like why would I care if other people have it better?