I'm always interested in Micheal's comparisons but rarely see anything more than an illustration of newer libraries etc showing natural improvements. The trade off of Arch distros is the increased workload of managing a constant change & inevitable instability. Arch devs are notoriously for kicking out capricious system borking changes and the Pacman package manager is rather weak at dealing with cumulative changes. 2% or 3 % potential ephemeral improvements in speed vs hovering over the cli 'fixing' things seems a poor bargain to me.
- Posts
- 6
- Comments
- 72
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 6
- Comments
- 72
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Linux @lemmy.ml Timing Flaw in systemd Cleanup Enables Root Privilege Escalation
politics @lemmy.world The State of the Union is an Oligarchs’ Paradise
Bazzite @lemmy.world Evaluation question
Apple @lemmy.world Can't change notifications email
Apple @lemmy.world File Manger for iPhone/iPad?
iOS @lemmy.world Recommend a File Manager app for iOs

At the age of 67, having tried and used everything, not just booted a vm, but honestly used, I found Arch a much higher maintenance burden. System borking changes are definitely a thing - see the "needs manual intervention" messages that happen often. I know Arch users seem to revel in this and gloss over it. Thats fine for them but I no longer get any sense of personal empowerment from tedious obsessive hand holding of any operating system. To me it's just unnecessary distracting extra work.