I hear something similar in small organizations. One guy can set up a mutual aid effort and someone else can do start a mildly controversial thing and you can see the attention get split.
My first thought was Zimbabwe and Israel when I heard "smaller players" but nah my point still stands they didn't mention a Western European country because they didn't want to
Yeah I have no idea what the state supreme court would effectively having a veto do.
There's also logistical stuff what would constitute a vote to rejecting a ruling. Also contrary ruling would need to be defined since I can see a Court/judge issuing a contradictory ruling that only differs slightly from a supreme court ruling.
My take is that the Issues with check's is that it requires people to enforce the check of power. Idk if state courts are any better than the supreme Court, most likely the state courts couldn't do anything with the high threshold. I wouldn't be against this amendment like this one, but it wouldn't come up that much
Yeah but if I believed in scary quote then I'd think everyone would get scared if I said "lacked good hygiene ritual"
But my next thought was they believe the person in the picture was doubted to be Che. Maybe that adds fantastical element of Che living on and orchestrating events presumably to this day
Well at least the illustrator put in some stars to show the man was beaten. You know to show that the man would be the victim of domestic violence and not bondage, domination, or sado-masocism
Lol a mentally healthy and pro social post, that's probably gonna piss everyone off