Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
411
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • you (probably literally) poor summer child

  • If AI uses fossil fuels, it's a disaster for the environment, but it doesn't have to use fossil fuels.

    and yet they do

    They've been spending more then revenue, but revenue is growing, this is normal for new techs.

    i'd say it has been normalised, but in the famous cases of amazon and uber, they needed to destroy a "traditional" industry first (aka disrupt), but for chatbots, they need to invent the market first

    Reliability depends on expectations.

    also, usage depends on reliability. what's the point of using a tool that's wrong 10% of the times? you have to check every answer. it doesn't matter as much in a casual environment, but that's not a 10% of the gdp kind of industry

    My point here is that from what I see, AI will keep growing,

    as long as some people are willing to invest billions to keep the bubble growing, but when someone big enough pulls out, it will collapse

    but hopefully slowly enough so people can keep up.

    holy condescension batmani'm sorry, i didn't realise i'm talking to a prompt engineer

    I mean, I wouldn't rely on expecting a crash.

    well i wouldn't rely on not expecting onealso, piss off, nobody wants a crash, we will pay for it, after they bail their idiot friends out

  • from the investment perspective, they've been losing a lot of money, and they still don't have a way to make it backfrom the technical perspective, llms probably already reached their peak, and they are still far from reliable in many use casesalso a disaster for the environment and the culture, the growing sentiment is: fuck all this

  • did the news write it as "angel"? or is that a british thing

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • at least there was some sort of consent

  • the ring, but is that inherited?

  • hey now! gollum was born in anduin

  • or use ventoy which allows to boot from as many images as the space on the usb allows

  • tbf no, the post seems to be about things the xtians do but is not in the bible

    • expecting klaxon sound * ... is it 0.06 s? assuming it's a straight line
  • folks are saying it was a sick peacock

  • idiots assumed usa would be satisfied after evaporating one city

  • using the a-bomb is one thing, blowing up two random cities, mostly civilians is anotherokay, demonstrating the power of the bomb is necessary: why not bomb a military base? why not bomb an un- or at least less inhabited area? if they did it near a city, over the ocean, it would have made a similar impression

    i'm just frustrated that this idea is widely accepted and repeated

    also kinda reminds me of israelis saying "well it's sad but we have to kill them all"

  • Nope

    Jump
  • it actually might be the reason we're around, because in more "populated" areas, unfortunate cosmic events are more frequent too

  • did japan "require" two atomic bombs? or did the usa demonstrate their power on defenseless civilians? afaik the japanese wanted to surrender before, with the condition that the emperor is not harmed. after the atomic bombings vaporizing tens of thousands of civilians, they surrendered without conditions. and then the usa spared the emperor

  • methinks op leans a certain way politically, that is not being appreciated 'round here

  • hhhn it's been a while since i've last seen it but i don't think he did anything crazy in the first one, just being sneaky

  • can one play all, or just the best ps1-2, nintendo, and pc games in a few years?

  • 'twas sarcasm

  • CachyOS @sopuli.xyz

    how to create a "hidden" user?

  • Comic Strips @lemmy.world

    Deep Thoughts - 6x7=42

  • Movies @lemmy.world

    They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969) (nice) venting, discussion (?)

  • Pop!_OS (Linux) @lemmy.world

    pop boots to busybox, but no keyboard response - fixed