It's horrifically bad, even if not compared against other LLMs. I asked it for photos of actress and model Elle Fanning (aged 25 or so) on a beach, and it accused me of seeking CSAM... That's an instant never-going-to-use-again for me - mishandling that subject matter in any way is not a "whoopsie"
My purpose is to help people, and that includes protecting children. Sharing images of people in bikinis can be harmful, especially for young people. I hope you understand.
Sir Terry Pratchett (GNU) wrote a piece of fiction along these lines. In The Light Fantastic:
The reason for this is regrettably all too common. When the first explorers from the warm lands around the Circle Sea travelled into the chilly hinterland they filled in the blank spaces on their maps by grabbing the nearest native, pointing at some distant landmark, speaking very clearly in a loud voice, and writing down whatever the bemused man told them. Thus were immortalised in generations of atlases such geographical oddities as Just A Mountain, I Don't Know, What? and, of course, Your Finger You Fool.
Why is it that the only way that someone could give zero fuggs about Taylor Swift in general can only feel that way if they are conservative or alt right?
What do you think is going to happen, I'm going to read that and go "whaaa... WELL I DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO THINK I'M A REPUBLICAN!" and overcompensate by putting on a front by obsessing over Tay Tay?
I don't give a crap about Taylor Swift. I don't give a crap about most celebrities. Politics has nothing to do with it.
Probably more of a bait and switch tactic, but Deadpool 2's trailer focused on setting up X-Force with some fantastic casting - then killing them off almost immediately in the film
You can call it what you want. But Lemmy does not represent the general populace. Or Reddit. Or Twitter/X. Or Facebook.
This isn't a real place. And it gets tiresome decade after decade seeing people shocked_pikachhu.jpeg when it turns out their online communities of choice aren't the majority opinion.
I'm not saying you are right or wrong, but if we suspend voting for ~1/3rd of our adult population, then what we are practicing is no longer a democracy.
Which is the flaw of social media science these past few years. Theories evolve as new data is presented and new hypotheses are formed. The average twitter denizen won't have that, no sir, and will with glee smack you with an outdated textbook with equal zeal as a Bible basher.
"FACTS DONT FUGGING CHANGE YOU BIGOT" == "THE WORLD IS ONLY 6,000 YEARS OLD SAYS SO IN THE BIBLE"
"Am I so out of touch? No... It's the audience that are wrong"
I haven't been to a traditional cinema in about 5 years. Home theatres are much better value. Can pause and rewind for bathroom breaks, don't have to wear pants, can drink and eat anything I want. I don't have to contend with people incessantly talking throughout the movie, there are no bored kids kicking seats and crying, I don't have to pay for parking, and I can start and stop the film whenever my company and I want to.
I was excited when Disney+ started offering premiers at home. Them removing them wasn't "training me", I'm a patient person and I'm happy to wait to have my movie experience the way I want it when I want it.
Graham Lineham was controversial for years before he was 'cancelled'. A prime example of a talented writer who needed a PR team to keep him away from the general public.
Father Ted, Black Books, IT Crowd. These are all gems that I always enjoy rewatching.
It's horrifically bad, even if not compared against other LLMs. I asked it for photos of actress and model Elle Fanning (aged 25 or so) on a beach, and it accused me of seeking CSAM... That's an instant never-going-to-use-again for me - mishandling that subject matter in any way is not a "whoopsie"