For sure, the popular opinion on reddit/Lemmy skews towards absolutely self-hosting everything they can, and multi-trillion dollar tech companies controlling AI skews the opinions of the technology negative. I have a BIL who runs self-hosted AI though (requiring 2 x 4090s in series for his use-case), so it can be done. The tech is only as shit as the user allows it to be (environmental concerns, obviously its pretty objectively shit)
You are going to get downvoted, but you're right. AI doesn't need to be used for every part of the entire development process for it to be "made with the help of AI". There are certain parts of the workflow that I'm sure is already being done regularly with AI, for example commenting code.
Mindlessly feeding prompts into chatgpt for the entirety of the core code or art would be terrible.
Cyber dopamine's test needs to be retested for this to be true. I love gaming on Linux and also regularly use my steam deck yada yada yada but come on.
Cyber dopamine himself says he's not a benchmark guy as well.
I like him a lot, he's really passionate and a positive breath of fresh air online, but the guy is surely stoned nearly 100% of the time. No way I'm taking his technical tests at face value.
60-80% better frames on Bazzite for space marine 2 was just too much to not be an error.
I was wondering if such a tool existed. There're some publishers that do deep sales on games released not that long ago, and I would think that there is a trend between game discount trends across games from the same publisher. Surely there is a way to map that to predict when a game will hit X value.
Maybe if they have you the mouse for free a sub fee a per month would be reasonable. But it's a mouse.
What killer software could one be paying for for a mouse subscription.
OpenSUSE TW gang rise up. I also got this black screen issue OP talked about but snapper rollback solved that (for now).