What about convection? There's been at least some mixing, right? So I'd guess the average age of a nucleus from the core (ignoring fusion) would indeed be less than from the surface, but I would think it's less difference (on average) than the raw math. If there's enough mixing it could be very little difference at all.
I recognize a certain type of Hollywood hot, like Chris Hemsworth is full of muscles and to me seems likely to be seen as attractive. Same with Henry Cavill, etc. But I know that stereotype from being exposed to it, nothing innate like when I see a beautiful woman and immediately feel how attractive she is.
And besides that one stereotype, I can't tell a hot guy from average. For example, when Ryan Reynolds was named People magazine's Sexiest Man Alive in 2010 it caught me completely by surprise, I had no idea. Similarly when people talk about George Clooney as a paragon of male attraction, I wouldn't have guessed that before hearing about it. (I don't at all doubt that it's true, I simply don't experience it myself.)
My theory is that I still hit all that stuff and make a bunch of noise when not trying to be quiet, but it isn't notable then so I just forget about it immediately.
Also the usual time I'm trying to be quiet is sneaking into bed in the dark after staying up too late, so I'm hitting stuff because I can't see it.
That's a reason why I much prefer the term "machine learning" (and cringe a bit at even that) to AI for anything short of AGI.
I do certainly think it's a great achievement to have computers able to 'hear' and 'see' for example, but I don't think that was ever properly "intelligence" on its own.
And don't get me started on pathfinding/combat algorithms for NPCs in games.
"There's a world outside your windowAnd it's a world of dreaded fearWhere the only water flowingIs the bitter sting of tearsAnd the Christmas bells that ring thereAre the clanging chimes of doom"
It's a lost cause, so I've nearly given up, but I still give 1-star reviews to apps that don't work because my phone is rooted. Every time they update.
What about convection? There's been at least some mixing, right? So I'd guess the average age of a nucleus from the core (ignoring fusion) would indeed be less than from the surface, but I would think it's less difference (on average) than the raw math. If there's enough mixing it could be very little difference at all.