I kind of agree. I've used blender on and off for at least 15 years now, so I know how to do many things now by heart. But, yeah if you have less experience or use it infrequently, it's tough. The more "recent" releases are more self explanatory though.
There might actually be good freeform tools in FreeCAD that I haven't tried yet.
A floss project's success is not necessarily marked by its market share but often by the absolute benefit it gives to its users. A project with one happy user and developer can be a success.
I'm not against probabilistic models and the like. I merely try to capture part of the reason they are not always well received in the floss community.
I use LLMs regularly, and there is nothing rivalling them in many use cases.
Flatpaks won't get their libs updated all at once by just updating a library. This can be very bad in cases like bugs in openssl. Instead of just updating one library and all other software benefiting from the fix, with flatpaks, you need to deal with updating everything manually and waiting for the vendor to actually create an update package.
I'm not 100% sure about this. Flatpak has some mechanisms that would allow to manage dependencies in a common fashion.
This and on top of being inexact, it's not understandable and un-transparent. These are two of the top reasons to push for free software. Even if the engine executing and teaching models are free, the model itself can't really be considered free because of its lack of transparency.
I think it's a short term vs long term debate. In the short term snaps are nice. They might help you get that software you want right now. In the long term though, it will only take away some of your rights and make you into a product.
There are also some interesting things to say about wording. Specifically consumer vs user. Software is not consumed, it's used and depending on the specific software, the user might be abused by the people producing and controlling the software.
Haha, als ich noch zur Schule ging war Luxemburg Stadt auch ziemlich provinziell, jetzt ist's es immer noch aber einen Ticken weniger. Freut mich dass es dir gefallen hat.
Probably because it's expensive and needs a lot of land. My point is still valid. The brine is a problem. Just like trash being a problem if not recycled properly (because it's more effort than just dumping or burning it).
That being said, I love the idea of having quasi infinite sweet water supplies but unfortunately it's not that simple.
The 1.0 release is around the corner. It's only a matter of a few weeks. It has the toponaming problem fixed and a built in assembly toolbox!