Skip Navigation

Posts
48
Comments
286
Joined
3 yr. ago

starting a new adventure in the fediverse!

he/him

  • no clue what you’re talking about… you seem to be imagining things

  • more like: we’re being forced to actually pay our employees slightly more and we’ll be damed if we’ll let that cut into our executive pay or our profit margin, so who’s left to screw? The Sellers!

  • well that sounds like…

    😀 🕶️ 😎

    good news

  • I think you replied to the wrong comment

  • here isn’t anything particularly special about them that would disproportionately attract the alt-right crazies

    lmao… that’s a good one

    YouTube’s algorithm seems to be funneling people to alt-right videos

    Feeding Hate With Video: A Former Alt-Right YouTuber Explains His Methods

    ‘Carol’s Journey’: What Facebook knew about how it radicalized users

    'It let white supremacists organize': the toxic legacy of Facebook's Groups

    this is just scratching the surface…

    a great video essay the subject:

    The Alt-Right Playbook: How to Radicalize a Normie (CW/TW)

  • “for hours” lol fuck off loser it’s the fucking internet, where interactions take a while.

    And “gaslight” and “abuse”? Jesus Christ kid, that’s some shit. I’m not replying anymore, so goodbye, you are being ridiculous and pathetic.

    way to prove my point with a swear- and insult-filled tantrum.

    I’m not replying anymore, so goodbye

    gee, ya promise? lmao

  • I’m really glad I’m not going through this now, but I would boycott if I were. I fully support these people and hope to goodness they get the relief they need!

  • huh?

  • twisting yourself into knots just to blame the US is absurd and not supported by the facts.

    so you admit that you lied about what I said, even quoting wha I actually did say to PROVE you lied, yet...

    The thing people are blaming the us for is increased opium production under the occupation of Afghanistan.

    you misrepresent a handful of commenters as “people’ making it seem like this is a commonly-held argument that rational people actually believe — without any evidence to back it up… or any evidence that it’s even true.

    so, based on these lies and bad-faith twisting of the argument, why should I engage with this discussion further knowing full well you’ll just continue to lie and twist my words because that’s exactly what you’ve been doing this whole time?

    So are you suggesting that the claim that the United States is responsible for opium production during the occupation of Afghanistan isn’t supported by the facts?

    see? you couldn’t even make it to the end of that comment before you did it again!

    can you not control it? is the lying a compulsion for you? I mean… the evidence of what I said is right there yet you insist I said something I clearly didn’t. it’s… very strange.

  • So you’re not going to explain how you came to the conclusion that the us occupation government in Afghanistan wasn’t responsible for opium production while it was in power and you’re also not gonna provide any source for the facts that led you to that conclusion?

    I never said that. why do you think lying, especially when there’s evidence of what I DID say, will win you any “points” or whatever you’re after here?

    I drew no conclusions as there was no evidence to support such a conclusion.

    you’re welcome to prove - with evidence - how you came to that conclusion. As of now, none has been provided to support that conclusion. Someone asserted that and provided some link, but the evidence did not back up their claim.

    so, keep raging, but you’re wasting your time trying to twist my words into something I never said.

  • I suggest making a post in the Plex user forums. Something’s not right with your setup if this keeps happening.

  • so does that mean that the production didn’t happen or it wasn’t the occupation governments fault?

    have fun on that journey of discovery!

    There’s no wrong answer here

    except for those which had no evidence to support them.

    I’m not gonna send the stasi to break down your door for being a lib

    you keep calling me names because it makes you feel better for trolling and bullying me, but you don’t know me at all nor what I believe because ii have said anything other than providing and debating the established facts. I could be communist or fascist or something in between, but all I’ve argued is the facts. nothing personal.

    I just want to understand how someone who clearly values logic and rhetoric came to that conclusion.

    I’ve said it hundreds of time, and you’re going to ignore it this time too: THE FACTS as supported by THE EVIDENCE.

  • Lol believe me, the only thing I’ve gotten or expect to get from this interaction is a headache.

    you have only yourself to thank for that. after all,. you made the decision to come and troll my comments, and you’re the one who refuses to stop. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    I’m not using any strawmen or rhetorical traps (what even is that?) or twisting your words.

    except for the many, many times I clearly show you were, you said “nah-uh!” and we keep going around in circles.

    all because you refuse to admit you’re wrong and keep hatefully trolling me due to your deep-seated insecurities. because you just can’t walk away due to some hangup about what an internet stranger happens to think.

    but go on and deny that, too, and I’ll just keep repeating the same thing again and agin until the end of time.

    tired of losing yet? because I’m happy t keep telling you this forever.

  • first, as I’ve said, I’ve presented facts. I’m no here to discuss your straw man r be drawn into any rhetorical “traps” you might try to get me to admit something you can twist into something you can claim as a ‘win”— and I know that’s all you’re after here.

    I’m obviously not going to engage with you when I know you’re arguing in bad faith an from a flawed premise.

    it’s clear that you’re after some sort of catharsis - something to prove your hours of trolling was worth it, and I’m going to tell you now: you won’t get it from me.

  • So, how’d you come to the conclusion that the us isn’t to blame for opium production during its occupation of Afghanistan?

    because there are zero facts to support it.

    you argument is fundamentally flawed. no matter how many ways you twist yourself up, twist my words, or twist anything else, you’re never going to successfully argue against the facts.

    you lost this argument hours ago. you’re just torturing yourself at this point.

  • Brooklyn, baby!

    I was responding to the weather thing, not calling out my location, lol :)

  • it has been my observation that those who cry the most about “freedom of speech”, especially in moderated communities like this one, are usually met interested in their “freedom of speech” amounts to wanting to engage in harassment, bullying, violence, and hate-speech without consequences, and, all to often, kiddie porn. All one has to do it take a look at “free speech” lemmy instances to see what I mean— it’s full of the things I just described, sometimes worse.

    now, I’m not accusing you of these things, but reasonable limits on speech protect the community from this stuff, and I can’t imagine a reasonable argument against such reasonable limits— and you’re here defending a well-known troll and bully, not for example, someone forbidden from practicing their religion or a same-sex couple trying to get married. This makes it very difficult to take your argument at face value rathe than simply an objection that a hateful bully and troll might face consequences for their actions.

    You liberal motherfucker

    then there’s this that confirms it.

  • I believe it’s a known bug where it might - every great once in a while - change the art anyway, but this is how it’s supposed to work.

    I’ve managed plenty of libraries over the years, and setting a custom poster keeps it that way— again, except in rare cases where something bugs out. but this is how it’s supposed to work.

    if you still experience weirdness, I recommend going to “Troubleshooting” under your server settings and running both “Optimize database” and “Clean Bundles"

  • What more do you want than “I was exaggerating”?

    since it was an obvious lie - not an "exaggeration" - not lying about it for hours and hours would be a nice place to start.

    But we never got there

    because I’m not stupid enough to believe such a feeble lie.

    Request an edit if you really think it’s so misleading, I’m sure @meth_dragon@hexbear.net would’ve initially just edited if you were so concerned that this “lie” would mislead others

    I that were true, they would have after I confronted them rather than doubling down, again and again, with one lie to cover another. for hours.

    Now I doubt it, because you’ve proven to be acting in bad faith by not just accepting the explanation and continuing the initial discussion

    refusing to accept such an obvious and feeble lie is not “acting in bad faith”. you coming here to try to gaslight me into believing that lie, however, IS:

    “DARVO is an acronym used to describe a common strategy of abusers. The abuser will: Deny the abuse ever took place, then Attack the victim for attempting to hold the abuser accountable; then they will lie and claim that they, the abuser, are the real victim in the situation, thus Reversing the Victim and Offender.”

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Huge Star Trek: Prodigy Season 2 Status Update Given By Executive Producer

    screenrant.com /star-trek-prodigy-season-2-episode-completion-update/
  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Plex @lemmy.ml

  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Finale Pits Starfleet Against the Gorn — Watch an Exclusive Clip

    www.yahoo.com /entertainment/star-trek-strange-worlds-finale-180000673.html
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Star Trek 4 Gets Disappointing Update After 7 Years In Development Hell

    screenrant.com /star-trek-4-movie-update-zachary-quinto/
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Star Trek Hero's Funnier Death Scene That Was Cut

    www.giantfreakinrobot.com /ent/star-trek-funny-death.html
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Paramount+ Head Honcho Just Made Some Comments About Streaming, And I Have A Bad Feeling These Relate To Star Trek

    www.cinemablend.com /streaming-news/paramount-head-honcho-comments-about-streaming-bad-feeling-star-trek
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Star Trek is finally ready for Spock to be human

    www.polygon.com /23824684/star-trek-spock-strange-new-worlds-actors
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    All the 'Star Trek' news we found from San Diego Comic-Con 2023

    www.space.com /star-trek-comic-con-news-sdcc-2023
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Star Trek: TNG's Booby Trap Put The Enterprise In A Classic Trek Problem - /Film

    www.slashfilm.com /1355959/star-trek-the-next-generation-booby-trap-episode-explained/
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Wil Wheaton's Genius Kirk and Khan Star Trek Theory Explains A 56-Year Old TOS Question

    screenrant.com /star-trek-kirk-khan-tos-wil-wheaton-theory/
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    Star Trek: Fastest Federation Starships, Ranked

    gamerant.com /star-trek-fastest-federation-starships/
  • Star Trek @lemmy.ml

    How New Paramount+ Strategy To “Super-Serve” Key Audiences And Franchises Could Impact Star Trek

    trekmovie.com /2023/08/08/paramount-evolving-content-strategy-to-super-serve-key-audiences-and-franchises/