Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
1
Comments
25
Joined
5 days ago

  • No it's not like that. It's much simpler.

    You pay DJT whatever particular bribe he's asking for your particular crime and you walk free. It usually starts in the millions of dollars.

  • Hmmm. NO.

    It's often used by people that would like to keep order in their meetings.

    I have no doubt that the guy was 💯 % right in his position and paper. I also have no doubt that the board has a 💯 % interest in keeping their meeting on topic. He is more than welcome to bring the topic up during an open topic discussion and/or to pass his info out, outside of the confines of the building that the group rented.

    If I (Barney Rubble) want to call a meeting of the Water Buffalos and Joe Dirt wants to pass out his literature about how over-fishing is killing the buffalo industry, we, the Water Buffalo board (Fred Flintstone, Barney Rubble and Pebbles) have every right to ask you to stop. If you don't stop, we have every right to have you removed.

    That's not fascism, that's order. You're more than welcome to call your own meeting of the over-fisher's complaint group on your own dime.

  • "Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a redditor!"

  • Distributing Political and Critical Material: The attendees were handing out copies of an editorial article previously published in the American Diabetes Association's own journal. The text criticized the current government administration for drastically cutting scientific and research funding.Protesting Near Scheduled Speakers: The leafleting took place right before the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was scheduled to speak at the conference.Breaching the Attendee Guidelines: The ADA strictly prohibits unapproved leafleting, demonstrations, or political protesting under its Attendee Code of Conduct. The policy states that all participants must act in a professional and respectful manner, keeping the conference "centered on advancing diabetes science".

  • Like it or not, they did violate their code of conduct.

  • Summary: A person can be a "Jewish Christian" if they are ethnically Jewish by heritage but Christian by religious belief, or if they belong to modern theological movements like Messianic Judaism which deliberately blend the two practices.

    • Wikipedia
  • Now wait a second. As the beloved prophet John Wayne (Hallowed be his name) said, "Hold your horses".

    I am an ordained minister in the ULC (Universal Life Church - I know it sounds like a life insurance policy gig - but I did pay like $75 for the full Reverend package), does that make me non-Christian.

    In truth, there are Jewish Christians, Hindu Christians, Scientology Christians, Latter Day Saint Christians, secular Christians, Wiccan Christians, Islamic Christians, even female, gay and black Christians (NOOOOOO! )

    I don't think you can pigeon-hole anybody into anything. There are literally 8.3 billion religions in the world right now. Your perspective/interpretation of God, Christianity, atheism, creationism, Jainism, Buddhism, Judaism, Islamism, feminism,... is completely different than mine.

  • Thanks for your honest perspective from another country. He is a king alright: The king of tyrants. He has done more to damage America and the world than anyone in my 64 year lifetime. He is a failure as a human being.

  • Too funny 😁 !

  • I'm with you. I've been emailing Cornyn and Cruz every week about Trump. Everything from USAID , to Iran, to Venezuela, to Cuba, to Iceland, to the Lincoln center, the arch, the East Wing, the whales in the gulf of Mexico, the slush fund, the $250 dollar bill... on and on. I always get a form letter back but I know their staffs have to keep a tally of how many voters feel each way about every issue. This libertarian republican is voting straight Democrat this fall. This maniac has to be stopped.

  • I won't "argue with you" but Roth did argue the point under the theory of "non- redressability". While some make think it's purely speculative, I say no it's not.

    It is just as preposterous for the president to destroy the East Wing of the Whitehouse (a national monument (landmark) that he doesn't own or have legal authority to damage) as it is to raze the Statue of Liberty. Both are kept in the trust of the National Park service, which he controls.

    Damaging the Whitehouse is equal to damaging any other national monument. He did it in a rush so no one could/would stop him. It is absolutely no different than blowing up mount Rushmore so he could put his face there.

    It's not his to destroy!

    I'm done arguing.

  • Well played!

  • You are right. I misread the order of the responses. He did completely demolish the East Wing (i mistakenly said West Wing) as a temporary tenant of the Whitehouse, without permission. That is a fact. His lawyers (DOJ) spuriously argued that he could pretty much destroy whatever he wanted to, provided he did it quickly enough and without notice, regardless of its legality. Therein lies the danger with this man.

    1. He just does illegal shit without permission, before anyone is even aware of it.

    2. The DOJ defends his illegal actions as though they were his personal lawyers, by offering specious arguments.


    The point is, that we can't discount any hairbrained idea he or his staff can cook up. Because they will try it. Those attorneys at the DOJ who argued for this on behalf of the the Whitehouse should be disbarred with prejudice.

  • So what is the next fork here? I've been handcuffed to android/Google (phones/ tablets) for decades. I have a couple of iPads but they don't have cellular and don't fit in your pocket.

  • Like hypothetically taking over Greenland? The dude is off his rocker. If he, or his cabinet even hints at doing something, you can bet he's already discussed it, and probably had someone draw up plans for it.

  • No. It was a great and kind and beautiful gift. We'll keep it. Thank you all the same. Instead we'll get rid of the current tennant of the Whitehouse by impeachment or 25th amendment or whatever works.

  • No it didn't happen.

    But you've got to nip this guy in the bud, because he will do some crazy ass shit before you know it. Before he tells you.

    Iran war, west wing, no audits, 1.776 billion dollar slush fund... kind of come to mind.

  • Yeah. I guess he hypothetically decided to tear down the West Wing of the Whitehouse, without permission, where he was just a tennant. Hypothetically speaking.

    Dude. You tear down a part of my house where you are a temporary guest and we'll see how that goes.

    Hypothetically speaking.

  • Well the Epstein files are bad, no doubt, but the chubby Cheeto-in-Chief just keeps getting worse and worse by killing more and more people.

    I don't think that the acts of his last 2 administrations can be compared to the Epstein files. I think they are just a furtherance of his psychopathic personality.

    Sexual slavery is really, really, really, really bad. No doubt. Murdering people (like the Venezuelan boat strikes, Iranian school girls...) and starving people (like the Cuban embargos) is just a whole 'nuther level of evil, that is just a further step into a mountainous shit load of psychopathy.

    It's not one (Epstein files) or the other (Iran war, boat strikes, starving Cubans); it's both and!

    To wit: He did all of that shit to children and sex slaves AND did all of that other crap to other human beings. It is additive, not exclusive or separate or explanatory.

    Hope I'm clear.

  • politics @lemmy.world

    DOJ says That Trump Could Tear Down the Statue of Liberty

    www.politico.com /news/2026/06/05/white-house-ballroom-donald-trump-00951892