That's not how privacy works though. You either have it when you don't need it or don't have it when you need it. You don't just get it when you need it.
It's not silliness to presume that you could eventually be in some situation where you need a high amount of privacy.
Maybe if you don't actually participate in society, there's some life circumstances that mean you would never need privacy. There's probably like a hundred people alive like that. I don't think they take taxis.
You can't imagine famous people, federal investigators, Union organisers, protected witnesses, or literally anybody else that wouldn't want their movements trackable by a company or anybody that company gets hacked by?
Some grandma being lawfully evicted from their home is violence.
This isn't a discussion about pillaging on horseback, it's a discussion about how regulatory capture, predatory businesses, and other exploitation is morally similar to pillaging on horseback. Not a discussion about a tied up hostage with a gun to their head, it's about how the threat of homelessness is the gun, you are a hostage.
I had to tailor my do not recommend and not interested in this subject clicks until I was left with the one advertiser that I'm actually interested in, and that's basically low voltage communication mux devices...
Finding that out will give you solutions to your problems