Skip Navigation

User banner

alyaza [they/she]

@ alyaza @beehaw.org

Posts
3318
Comments
1253
Joined
4 yr. ago

internet gryphon. admin of Beehaw, mostly publicly interacting with people. nonbinary. they/she

  • Axios reveals text of peace plan: Ukraine to relinquish its territories permanently, Russia to receive amnesty

    Jump

  • Whatever happened to U.B.I.?: Guaranteed income in the A.I. age

    Jump

  • now that it's clear a universal basic income would empower workers (and therefore make it less necessary for people to work to live), it's very funny to look back on the time period where its biggest boosters were technolibertarian, technocratic Silicon Valley types

  • Court blocks Texas redistricting, finding it likely unconstitutional, with DOJ largely to blame

    Jump

  • yes, it's not legally contingent on anything that happens in Texas

  • OpenAI maps out the chatbot mental health crisis

    Jump

  • given that OpenAI has a vested interest in downplaying the severity of this problem (especially relative to its total number of users) i'd treat this as a lower bound of the scale of this exists at--pretty bad!

  • Spit On, Sworn At, and Undeterred: What It’s Like to Own a Cybertruck

    Jump

  • there's some real deadpan gold in this one, such as the immaculate:

    How do you feel about becoming a political lightning rod?

    People occasionally just flip [me] off or whatever, but nobody's come up to me and tried to make a statement about anything. Personally, it's kind of dumb. It's just a vehicle. So it's ironic that it would even become a political statement, but nonetheless it is. [Editor’s note: Taylor was arrested and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. He was later pardoned by President Trump.]

  • These Tenants Are Going on Strike Against ‘Rent Debt’

    Jump

  • Star Citizen fans sigh deeply, rub their foreheads as developer casts doubt on Squadron 42's 2026 release: 'I don't know if we're going to make it'

    Jump

  • you're being pointlessly aggressive about something that is subjective and which obviously cannot progress from the fundamental disagreement you have here, please chill out a bit

  • L.A. Council Committee Approves Step toward Eliminating Parking Requirements

    Jump

  • What about changing the parking requirements to be vehicle agnostic? Require construction projects to have parking for X people, rather than X cars, and consider the requirement met if it’s a mix of bicycle parking, cargo bicycle parking, and car parking.

    this is already how most parking mandates work (they're not for X amount of cars, they're obliged to have a set ratio of parking spaces to people), and changing it in this manner would almost certainly lead to no change because Los Angeles is extremely car-dependent and sprawling, and bicycling is only useful with actual pro-bike infrastructure which largely doesn't exist.

  • Support for Phone Bans in Schools Is Growing, but Is It Enough to Help Kids?

    Jump

  • It’s not a coincidence this is happening alongside age verification and outright bans. It’s all one big manufactured moral panic to isolate a vulnerable population I won’t give an once because people like you won’t stop taking.

    you are the sort of uncritical, single-minded person who is going to help turn us all into digital serfs on a latifundium that can never be overthrown and permanently enriches a class of technolibertarian freaks that want to remake society in their image. the fact of the matter is smart phones as a whole are arguably the most successful corporate mechanism to privatize social life yet devised, and any "liberation" you think can be derived from them by any class of people is illusory without overthrowing capitalism. the phone companies and the apps they host have successfully positioned themselves as middlemen with free ability to hoover up an endless amount of "consensually given" data that can then be used to quantify said social life, commodify our personhood, and preemptively snuff out any real competition to the existing economic oligopoly. if you were to structure a system so incapable of being challenged that we're doomed to live under it forever, this would be a pretty good way to do that.

    children, needless to say, are especially not liberated by this state of affairs--or by the future that people like Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg want to build and which you seem to want to enable--and giving them free rein online in this absolutist way because you want to "emancipate them" is, ironically, often the best way to ensure capitalists exploit their labor and data in the current system. Roblox, for example, has made a fucktillion dollars off of your subtextually proposed strategy of just "letting kids be kids"--those children have essentially provided the company with a free, uncompensated, popular series of games for them to exploit the entire value of. totally coincidentally, they don't even spend any of that money they've made protecting children from the actual social harms children could be exposed to on their platform, so Roblox is awash in grooming and cyberbullying and hate speech and sometimes even graphic violence that is never dealt with.

    You’re also conflating certain corpo slop apps with literally any use of any mobile device, which is a common slight of hand that doesn’t get called out enough

    the "corpo slop apps" have like 95% market penetration among people under-18 and as such are the almost-exclusive mediums through which they interface with digital spaces (because they are explicitly engineered to make us envious and addicted, and to make us all into people who live and die for the fix for attention that such websites give us). let's not pretend this is a serious "conflation" when all available evidence is this is the overwhelming use-case of mobile devices.

  • Support for Phone Bans in Schools Is Growing, but Is It Enough to Help Kids?

    Jump

  • Blanket bans are going to cause lots of issues, and for some kids (generally the ones who are already the most bullied and vulnerable), will cause more harm than good.

    name one issue that a blanket ban will cause "more harm than good" on.

  • Support for Phone Bans in Schools Is Growing, but Is It Enough to Help Kids?

    Jump

  • Actual LGBT and neurodiverse people disagree with you.

    let's not invoke monoliths here, i am both and i think there are quite a lot of defensible arguments for restricting phones in the specific context of a learning environment--not least of which is that it's hardly "censorship" or "isolation"[^1] to ask them to just not use a phone for roughly 8 hours of the 24 hours in any given day.

    [^1]: social media is arguably far more alienating and inhuman on average to children and young adults than it is liberating

  • Air Canada flight attendants reach ‘tentative’ deal with airline to end strike

    Jump

  • Bruce Harrell, Katie Wilson each poised to advance to general election in Seattle's 2025 mayoral contest - still statistically tied

    Jump

  • this is significant because it initially looked like Harrell, the more centrist option, would breeze through this race; now, though, it seems like a very real possibility that Seattle will also elect a progressive mayor this November in Katie Wilson. (her platform is, though not socialist like Zohran Mamdani's, still pretty good and deserves your support)

  • Is it time to start planning a post-Trump restoration?

    Jump
  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • we're going to start removing these because they're indistinguishable from low-quality bait.

  • Overtourism in Japan, and How it Hurts Small Businesses

    Jump

  • long-time Beehaw users might see much of this article as the offline corollary to one of the works that influences our community philosophy, which is "Killing Community"

    If you want to absolutely destroy a website that is all about building communities and meeting new people, then aim for the site and all communities to always be growing as much as possible. Make that a design goal of the site. Pump those subscriber numbers up.

    What you’ll get is a place where everyone is a stranger, where being a jerk is the norm, where there is no sense of belonging, where civility and arguing in good faith is irrelevant because you’re not talking to someone, you’re performing in front of an audience to make the number next to your comment go up so you can briefly feel something that almost resembles belonging and shared values.

  • Humpback Whales Blow Bubble ‘Smoke’ Rings to Communicate With Humans

    Jump

  • As women have far fewer babies, the U.S. and the world face unprecedented challenges

    Jump

  • When we everyday people see patterns, we then make deductions from them that tend to be accurate. [...] Let people see evidence and make their own deductions

    ...no? as humans, our pattern recognition, while well refined, often still causes us to make completely incorrect inferences from nothing. even restricted to the realm of the medical: you need only look at what people think made them sick versus what actually does; most people will blame food poisoning on the last thing they ate, or their sickness on the last person they encountered, even when there are many other possible reasons for their sickness.

    also: a pre-print by definition has not been subject to rigorous peer review--it's roughly analogous to a draft--so i would be exceedingly hesitant to even assert something like it having "good data." even if you're the author you wouldn't definitively know that at this stage.

  • No Staff Too Small to Strike

    Jump