160 people is a very tiny force, feels unlikely that this is China's official (official between Russia and China) contribution. China is a country with twice the population of Europe, and 160 guys is all they send to help?
This explanation feels more likely:
One of the captured soldiers claimed he paid 300,000 rubles (roughly $3,000) to a middleman in China to join the Russian military in exchange for the promise of citizenship, Ukraine's Luhansk military unit press service told Ukrainian Pravda earlier in the day.
If you're organisation is small/flexible enough, maybe look into using some kind of stacked diff system. We used graphite at my previous company and it's amazing for working with these kinds of things where you have a million little things to fix and they're all kind of dependent on each other.
You certainly have to account for it, but surely some consideration must be paid to the fact that most of these images are quite useless. I've probably generated 100s of midjounrey pictures myself, to very little benefit except seeing what it was capable of. If we treat these usages as equal to cover image for a blog, I don't think it's quite fair. Not to mention the actively harmful usages (CP, deep fakes etc).
Aight so, we have two huge economic powers in the world and one that's lesser but still very big. The two huge powers are fighting each other to the death, destroying each others economies as well as their own. Lets go EU Century? 🙏
I don't really have a horse in this race eitherway, but what about finding a person who can draw a decent looking thumbnail in 15 minutes? Probably that's gonna be using various webservices such as fiverr or something along the way?
But the whole idea of comparing them is kinda funny. As if that human would just be turned off and not consuming any energy if they weren't making a thumbnail for your blog. Though maybe they'll make a cup of coffee they wouldn't have otherwise before getting to work. You never know!
Is this a rhetoric question? Because if you have the answer I'm interested to know.
If not, I don't know. At 2:18 this video references a previous attempt to re-arm Europe, and that one of the reasons it never got through was because the US didn't like it. It seems to be referencing the Saint-Malo declaration, but I've yet to be able to confirm US role in this.
We are? I was under the impression that this had stopped, and that we now only do so indirectly in ways that are difficult to track (e.g. India importing raw materials from Russia, refining and shipping it to Europe).
Fully agree with your analysis that most of this is about Trumps ego and an attempt at asserting power.
Surely there is zero political support for this in Europe. Of course we're hurting badly from the tariffs, but at least in my circle I don't see anyone supporting bending over to any demand he sends us.
Almost as soon as Trump was reelected, von der Leyen suggested opening negotiations to buy more American liquefied natural gas (LNG). But POLITICO reported that the U.S. had, in response, offered no clarity about how a deal would work.
Don't quite follow this though, does the EU need more fossil fuels? Aren't we moving away from it? Is this aimed at replacing russian natural gas?
Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna accused Hungary of siding with Russia, saying it’s "on Putin’s team" and no longer aligned with European interests.
Literally everyone knows this. Even I know this.
Tsahkna urged forming a "coalition of the willing" to bypass Hungary’s veto power in EU decisions requiring unanimity.
Sorry, is this not already happening? I thought this was definitely already being very heavily discussed.
He warned that revoking Hungary’s voting rights under Article 7 is increasingly likely, citing Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s actions as threats to EU security and unity.
This too, aren't we like 75% there already? Genuinely asking, I don't know, but this was my impression.
Penicillin / antibiotics comes to mind. As well as vaccines. "Oh you're body is being taken over by millions of microscopic organisms? Take this pill and it will go away. Maybe take this shot too so it won't happen in the first place."
And of course computers + the internet were a pretty big boom too.
If the EU organised a proper centralised and integrated army, how would one country attack another one within this alliance?
I guess at some intermediary stages it would look more like NATO does now, with individual armies that are not very tightly integrated with each other, but if it's being integrated into the EU I'm thinking more in terms of an EU central command. Similar to how it would be incredibly difficult for Sweden to declare war on Skåne.
I agree, but there's definitely some more integration that can be done. An initially opt-in military organisation would be great because it doesn't really make sense for individual EU countries to do military alone. We should never fight with other countries in the block (and a military organisation would make that impossible), and it doesn't make sense that the EU wouldn't protect other member states.
I guess we might get that for free when we inherit NATO...
day before yesterday, 105. yesterday 125. today 145.
so I guess 165 tomorrow?