Right. AI coding assistant help users move fast. If the user is a thief, that's on the thief. A competent developer of a thief, considering the game worked at all. AI alone accomplishes none of this.
I am an American, born here. I get it. Hardship is not the destruction of lives, nor is bankruptcy, nor is homelessness. The destruction of life is the destruction of life. What path are we on? How far down the tracks are you? The same track we're all tied to on this sinking ship. So, quick! Do nothing differently!!
If every American did just a bit of that simultaneously, nobody would be worrying about either. They'd be worrying about their country and it's consequences to the globe. Something Americans are incapable of. No mass unrest, no unrest to register. The job market is already upsidedown, again, under trump, again. What's the worst in tipping the scale over and bouncing off of rock bottom? It's what the world needs. It's what you need. It's what I need. China did it. The French still do it. Americans have lived catered to buy slaves and slave labor since this countries inception, ain't nobody willing to get uncomfortable even in the face of oppressive regime. So, yes. Get into unsecured debt. Try out homelessness while you protest in the streets. Nobody in their right minds goes to work, protest, then work again. Fucking commit or be honest that your so called values are hollow virtue signaling. Come on in, the waters fine.
Yup. Keep going to work to fund atrocities domestically and overseas. When you're not doing that, show up at a demonstration. But don't ever demonstrate violently like the French or anything. That's bad, mkay?
Probably some "sale" for when you purchase something else for $50 at 50% markup. Bonus of adding to "sales" tally for some generations old dogshit flash drive they otherwise could not sell.
This.... is incorrect. Generated code can and has been copyrighted, but not by the model generating it. Humans can get copyrights, digital entities cannot (nor can your pet monkey.) Now, can a human copyright code they did not author? Yes, absolutely. Courts only care that a human had a hand in as little as refining the output or making selections for the agent. Copyright claims look for exercised creative judgement and infringement on existing copyrights.
Sincerely... if you can give a single shit about ai in code, you should be able to tell it was used. If you cannot differentiate human from ai authored code, you do not have a seat at the table. jeer from the soap boxes. code is not art. code is code. get over it. does it compile or run and do the thing, cool, fuck cares who or what wrote it. clutching pearls yall cant even define.
It really has come a long way in a relatively very short time in terms of quality and, well, shitting under the rug