Personally I treat my windows pc as a gaming console. I play games on it and nothing else. Then it becomes a non issue: so what if they track my gaming activity?
Video très intéressant, mais je crois que l'auteur se trompe sur un aspect de la loi C-11.
Si le contenu canadien occupe X% des suggestions, alors ça crée un sous espace de compétition - et ce genre de contenu va occuper un plus grand espace dans le psyché des gens.
L'argument que "si le contenu était bon il serait déjà suggéré" est pas tant bon. Les algorithmes sélectionnent pas ce qui est bon. Ils sélectionnent ce qui est populaire. Donc le contenu qui cible un groupe culturel plus petit est pénalisé. Le marché américain est tellement grand et leur "machine" médiatique tellement tentaculaire et intégrée qu'ils enterrent tout le reste.
I think his idea was to reduce visibility of harmful content (like exclude it from the algorithm, or maybe just penalize it heavily) without fully banning it.
I suppose downvotes are also a solution (up to a point - doesn't work unless there is a strong enough consensus).
But even if these don't work it doesn't mean censorship is the only solution. Just because we don't have a good idea doesn't mean nobody will.
Radication and disinformation are serious problems and some censorship is better than nothing - but still seems like there has to be a better way.
Personally I treat my windows pc as a gaming console. I play games on it and nothing else. Then it becomes a non issue: so what if they track my gaming activity?