Clinically depressed, chronically online,Socialist discordian statist for open science,Independent journalism and gay crime.
My Communities:
!art_alchemist_guild@lemmy.today — Ask, share, learn and show off with the most DIY of artists.
!cool_rocks@lemmy.today — For cool rocks.
!brandnewsentence@lemmy.today — For brand new sentences
!Independent_Media@lemmy.today — Independent world journalism news feed.
!indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works — Independent news from Canada.
!wildfeed@sh.itjust.works — Trash. Global, diverse news, reports, blogs and listicles.
I keep making communities. Please help.
This is my main account.
Former Me:ceedoestrees@lemmy.worldicytrees@lemmy.todaytrash_goblin@piefed.zip (fuck piefed)icytrees@sh.itjust.workswoad@lemmy.ml
Land back. Do drugs.

















That's what banning and blocking are for, those are features already up to the users, admins and moderators. So what's the point of the flag in the first place?
In order to notice a flurry of users downvoting the same person consistently, someone would have to be investigating. I'm a mod and I'm not sure how to begin to tell if they happened to be sockpuppets. This means tools would have to be built to monitor where votes are coming from and flag users who vote together (if they don't already exist.) That increases mod duties to patrol a feature because it can be gamed, when, again, there are already tools for users to decide for themselves who they interact with.