Skip Navigation

OwenEverbinde

@ OwenEverbinde @reddthat.com

Posts
3
Comments
86
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Locked

    threads is already going great 💀

    Jump

  • Maybe we'll finally be cool enough to get banned - Klanned Karenhood

    Oh, you could have been that cool already. Just do as Ijeoma Oluo did.

    1. Provoke the racists. They will come flooding into your inbox with death threats.

    2. Report the messages to Meta so they can say, "doesn't violate our community standards."

    3. Screenshot the messages and Meta's enabling response, and post them publicly on your Facebook page to show how seriously Meta takes right-wing death threats and hate speech.

    Done. Banned "for posting hate speech." You could have been cool all along, Klanned Karenhood. You just have to go after the right people.

  • What's a true fact that is so misleading it's borderline misinformation?

    Jump

  • Yeah... that's a pretty reasonable conclusion. It's hard to just state outright though, when I live with the exact sort of person described in your comment.

    It's interesting: the people who are fine with calling an entire race murderous seem to take great umbrage at being considered "racist."

    It's the r-word to them -- a slur used to invalidate their concerns and diminish the importance of their well-being.

    That their concerns ought to be invalidated -- since they are the racist result of racist fear-mongering -- is never well-received.

  • What's a true fact that is so misleading it's borderline misinformation?

    Jump

  • My pleasure.

  • What's a true fact that is so misleading it's borderline misinformation?

    Jump

  • Half of all murders go unsolved. So even if you assume the group making up 50% of the murder arrests is impossible to wrongfully convict, they would still only make up 25% of the murders that occurred because a whole 50% of the murders are a mystery.

    And it would be insane to assume murder arrests are a perfect representative sample for all of the murders that occur in the entire United States.

    Some demographics have more money and are more likely to be able to hire their own lawyers and get away with murder, even if they're guilty. Other demographics have less money and are more often forced to rely on a broken public defender system.

    It's no coincidence that black people, one of the poorer demographics, are found in over 50% of exonerations for wrongful convictions despite being a much smaller portion of the US population.

  • What's a true fact that is so misleading it's borderline misinformation?

    Jump

  • I don't know if this counts, since it's only a "true fact" if you are fine with carefully chosen words and the omission of crucial information...

    But the 13-50 stat is dangerously misleading.

    You know,

    Black people make up 13% of the population, but 50% of the violent crime.

    Black people in America do, in fact, make up 50% of the murder arrests according to FBI crime statistics

    That much is true.

    But certain people tend to use this fact to assert that police officers are far more likely to be killed by black people than by white people. Therefore, the stats that show them brutalizing black people at a higher rate -- since they fall short of that 50% number -- are evidence that they hold back around black people to avoid appearing racist.

    The users of this stat heavily imply black people are more violent and murder-prone, and hence a greater threat. The argument also carries with it an implied benefit to eugenics or a return to slavery (to anyone paying attention.)

    But no one using this stat ever explores potential causes for the arrest rate disparity, instead letting their viewers assume it comes from "black culture" (if they are closeted racists) or "bad genes" (if they are open racists).

    There's no attention paid to the fact that black people make up over half of overturned wrongful convictions

    There's no attention paid to the stats further down in that same FBI crime stats table that make it clear that black people make up 25% of the nation's drug arrests, despite making up close to 13% of the US's total drug users. (Their population's rate of drug use is within a margin of error of white people's rate of drug use). It should be strange that a small portion of the perpetrators of drug crimes make up such an outsized portion of the total drug arrests in this country. But the disparity doesn't even get a mention.

    There's no attention paid to the fact that more than half of US murders go unsolved, meaning even assuming impartial sentencing and prosecution, we would only know black people committed 50% OF 50% of the murders -- 25%. And in a country where 98% of the land is owned by white people and the public defender system is in shambles? Which demographic do you think would be able to afford the best defense, avoiding conviction even when guilty, and ending up overrepresented in the "unsolved murder" category? If only 50% of murders end in a conviction, that means every murderer who walks into a courtroom has a solid chance at getting away with it. Even more solid if the murderer belongs to the richest race. The murder arrest rate by race winds up just being a measure of which demographics can afford the best lawyers, rather than any proportional representation of each demographic's tendencies.

    They mention none of that. The people hawking this statistic intentionally lead their viewers to assume, "arrested for murder" is equivalent to "guilty of murder." And that 50% of the murder arrests is equivalent to 50% of the total murders. The entire demographic is assumed to be more dangerous.

  • Public clocks

    Jump

  • Damn you're good