Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
27
Comments
4025
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's connection history. CSI motion detection software storing information it collects would be entirely independent of that. How much it saves and for how long would depend on the size of the router's memory.

  • MVP

  • Opensource tech to do the same thing has been in the hands of the people for a long time. This is just a different way of doing it without motion sensors.

  • inert meaning not a wifi device.

  • People usually decide whether religious material is literal or an allegory to suit whatever point they're trying to make, and using the precise wording of whichever translation works best for that.

  • The Prime Directive doesn't apply to Federation planets, stations, colonies etc.

  • You'd be surprised. Some of us still want to give them maps and such as.

  • Ok... your comment history says you don't know "times tables" past 5x and that a link was "unreadable" which I checked and it was fine. Izzat you, Mister Bond?

    Anyway, whatever the secret plan is, please hit the big red button ASAP so we can all thank you!

  • That's because Xfinity offers motion sensing as a feature, which requires this tech in the router. Presumably it's configurable and costs extra to turn on.

  • Uh-oh, Trump just put a yuge tariff on Chinese tinfoil.

  • I don't think a person has to carry anything. The tracking is based on measuring the interference a moving person (or a dog) creates between the router and a connected device like a range extender or a networked printer.

  • From what I've just read, the tech doesn't seem ready to identify people yet. It can supposedly detect hand gestures, but facial recognition I seriously doubt. But that's probably just a matter of improving the tech. See this article for more info.

  • Very interesting concept. I was curious about how in the hell this could be done. This article explains the general method.

    When an inert object like a person moves around between the router and stationary connected devices like computers and printers, it interferes with the signal. The pattern of interference plus math can be used to plot the movement of the object - and even measure subtle changes like hand gestures. Home security software from companies like Xfinity can already use this tech to send you an alert when something is moving around in your house, without needing additional hardware. Imagine an informercial where a guy holds up a handful of "clumsy motion sensors" with wires sticking out of them, and "confusing instructions". Not if you just let your router do it!

    As far as being a new and sinister means of surveillance, evil companies could already theoretically tap into anybody's motion sensors or security cams. The difference with WiFi tracking is that you wouldn't necessarily know it's there.

  • If you're technical you might like enjoy this article that explains how the tracking works. Basically the router can perform math on the interference created by objects moving around the room. It seems like this would have to be part of the router firmware, which doesn't sound like a standard feature. But if it is, the fix would be to install modified firmware with that function disabled. The smoking gun will be if somebody gets into DMCA trouble for doing this.

  • And yet Taiwan has welcomed McDonalds, Burger King, Domino's, Krispy Kreme...

  • Wowee

    Jump
  • Even a multicolor assortment of 16 Polands!

  • fast fact: For westerners who still think of India as a faraway little spot, slightly under a fifth of the world's population lives there. More than 4x as many people as the USA. So this is kind of a major deal, humanity-wise.

  • Ooooh, found the dangerous badass who's gonna make 'em sorry. You must have a very particular set of skills! Help us, Obi Wan, you're our only hope.

  • I've been irritated since around 1979 when we stopped being "personnel" and became "human resources". It's always puzzled me that there was no massive backlash to that.