By "the cloud" people are generally referring to all the services and storage that you are connected to across the internet. This exists on other computers owned by companies or other individuals. Yes there are lots of storage services available from Apple iCloud to Google Drive to OneDrive (Microsoft) to lots and lots of others. They tend to work in slightly different ways. Some just "backup" your device and you can't really use them as a replacement for browsing photos for example. Others do exactly this. Most have a small amount of free space available after which you pay. If you are looking to free up space on your SSD I would make sure the one you go with is a well known, reliable one, as they will be the only ones with a copy of your data- you want to make sure they look after it properly!
- Posts
- 13
- Comments
- 879
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 13
- Comments
- 879
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Manipulative headline? In the technology community?? Que devient ce monde..
South Korea + US better elevate their threat model of the NK army to "now thoroughly trained by someone who once shot themselves in the leg"
For sure. Askhistorians is still good, as are some niche technology ones and regional ones. But the rest are trash compared to 10-15 years ago
It's all bullshit. Reddit is an increasingly low quality magazine for 'B grade students with a superiority complex'. AITA is just the very-obviously-made-up agony aunt section..
There's a thin line between being entertained and being informed. The latter requires more energy to repel BS. Often a community is started by genuine people who want to share high quality articles. The reputation attracts a larger crowd who are 'entertained' by this, and while valuing the integrity of the content, do not themselves exert the same effort. At some point the 'entertained' crowd start contributing content themselves, of lower quality, but which is popular for its entertainment rather than truth value. Times this progression by ten if the platform owners are monitising attention. 'casuals' and the pursuit of profit drive enshitification.
"one blink for everything's ok, two blinks for nothing's wrong.."
Good. They should stop frantically adding new features and tidy up some of the crap we have to use day to day.
It's simpler code to re-download the file than retrieve what cached version may or may not exist in memory
This seems incredible
There would already have to be a data layer that serves the main web page renderer. That layer would already have to handle looking in the cache or making an http request in event of a cache miss. It would seem almost trivial for a UI operation like 'save to disk' to simply call that layer in the same way
For a few hundred K image file I can understand why some might not bother, but I've seen this behaviour where a browser already has an MP4 cached (such that it can replay any part of it without subsequent http traffic) and yet it still makes a new request when saving. It's weird to be honest..
Have often wondered this myself, would love to know the answer
I watched a lot more Star Trek as a kid but it's always the Star Wars universe that I feel drawn to. I can't really quantify it, I think it's just an aesthetic thing. I suppose Star Wars feels more 'wild west'.
Old school sci-fi: am re-reading the Asimov robot stories again. Always something new to reflect on.
They are probably unsure of your motives; are you analysing the business or analysing them? Software problems are extremely hard to estimate unless there is almost complete disclosure and discovery. It's like asking people how long a crossword is going to take without seeing the clues. Or asking how long they're going to spend on a chess move in 3 turn's time. They are possibly cagey because you are asking questions that betray the fact you are seeing this as a management problem rather than listening to what they're telling you about their craft.
Or possibly your manner of communicating is attuned to more socially intuitive people. Try presenting what you need as a problem for them to solve with a clear start and end. That way you're collaborating, and they know when their obligation to interact with you is "done".
Instead of open questions like "can you tell me how X is currently working?" try specific problem setting questions like "I'd like to see if we can make X process be 10% faster, what would that look like?" or "what would you say are the top two things that affect the time process Y takes?"
They may not want to offend you, because many of the answers might be "obvious" and, also, if they're honest workers, as many are, there may not be any clear way to improve certain things as they're already trying their hardest, and your investigation feels more like an inquisition.
Again, it may be that you're asking someone "how can I get you to get this crossword done faster?". It's sort of the wrong question. Unless you're willing to listen to their bugbears which might be the actual things affecting how efficiently things run but might not be the kind of answers project management want to hear.
I can relate. I wrote an insanely good optimiser for the loading of data to the trading platform for a major fund management company and there are like.. 2.. people in the world who know and appreciate
Are you really trying to tell me that Germany exploiting African countries because of “national greatness” is ideologically different to claiming Islam is the bane of Germany’s existence?
no, I'm claiming that shoehorning people with serious reservations over conservative islam into a racial narrative is itself part of the problem
How come Germans are okay with immigrants and refugees coming into Germany to work and support their retirement
they aren't. the article itself mentions that such immigrants faced discrimiation and resentment. the necessity of immigration is an economic one arising from a class conflict between global capitalists who seek profitability at any cost and the working class who resent the local changes made to accomodate this while their ongoing struggle is ignored
the same old racist views that religion is the problem and if only we could get the “good immigrants” and not the “bad ones” nationalistic (nazi) groups would accept them with open arms.
nazis are a minority. they end up attracting the previous moderates when those people feel deserted by the political elite. shaming any discussion of preferring ones own cultural values (oftentimes just a placeholder for "human rights") to those espoused in large degrees by immigrant populations is the beginning of this. in fact we're far past it. any talk of needing discerement over immigration on basis of a persons views or religious convictions is hardly possible without someone overreacting and crying "racism".
muslim communities have significant portions who i) do not support homosexuality being legal (82% with 52% oppose, 30% unsure) ii) think gay teachers should be fired (47%) iii) feel women should always be subservient to their husband (39%) iv) will not condemn violence as a response to insulting the prophet muhammad (32%) v) would not report someone to the police if they expressed a desire to engage in terrorism abroad (66%) vi) support the replacement of national law with Sharia Law (23%) vii) either support or are indiffernet to stoning people for adultery (21%) viii) support polygamy (31%) (https://www.channel4.com/press/news/c4-survey-and-documentary-reveals-what-british-muslims-really-think)
and this is amongst settled muslim communities in Britain (I am more familiar with UK research, but I don't think it unfair to consider UK and German muslim immigants broadly similar) immigrants are typically far more conservative (see: your BAMF report)
pretending that having some objection to this is "racism" is only fueling the current problems seen across Europe as populations find the only parties sharing any of their concerns over this are lunatic far right groups
working versions of your links:
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-needs-288000-foreign-workers-annually-until-2040-study/a-70885279
I’m sorry, but are you serious? That is quite literally what the AfD does!
I was asking quite specifically "who" because it is not an official policy of the AfD. There are certainly large racist elements in AfD but I do not believe all of their voters are frothing at the mouth irrational xenophobes. The voting public are generally less ideologically committed than the parties they end up voting for (again, notwithstanding that there are certianly racists among them). And this is the tragedy of the current discourse; one cannot currently question the wisdom of allowing conservative islam populations into the country without being accused of being "extreme" and of being far more to the right than one actually is. The result is that moderate politicians find the discussion unsafe and have deserted the popluation who are, in no small measure, concerned about the unchecked immigration of those who favour violence as a response to criticism of the prophet muhammad and would in large part remain silent if an associate expressed the desire to engage in terrorism* (The research in this area is UK based but I don't think it's unfair to consider muslim immigrants to the UK and Germany as being largely similar)
The shunning of any talk of "cultural superiority" in polite, liberal, university educated society is what results in the only people talking about it being the far right, and then in exaggerated, fantastical terms. It is trivial for them to pull a veneer of respectability over their possible true intentions (as the AfD are no doubt doing), the result of which is they win votes. And a country that could have had more moderate solutions ends up sliding into insanity.
All because there is an overreaction any time someone suggests that immigration should be controlled on the basis of a persons views or religion or that ones ongoing immigrant status should be conditional on one's behaviour or assocation. Instead a country ends up with little control in this area and the rise of extreme parties that begin to suggest the only solution is to deport generations of migrants..
Banning such parties will not change anything. Starting to talk in moderate terms about how immigration might be far slower and more discriminating is the only thing that will rob the far right extreme parties of their saviour narrative.
If they were worried that TikTok gave it to them then yes.
those are words that you putting in my mouth
apologies that wasn't my intention
But there has to be a difference between worrying about who comes to this country and calls to expell every brown person from Germany.
who actually is "calling for the explusion of every brown person in germany?" isn't casually referring to this whole block of complex views in such an offhand way part of the problem? can people not express a desire for some who have entered the country with repugnant views to now leave without this being taken as a pogrom against all of a certain ethnicity? i don't think this is what you are saying. i'm just pointing out how easy it is to generalise and mask views that might be different to our own liberal laissaz faire ones but are not in themselves that extreme.
In the world of today, don’t you worry about democracy,
i do. but it survived when the country was dominated by people listening to the pulpit every sunday. and it survived when everyone decided to dispense with "christian" morality at all in the 60's and 70's. it survived when literacy was below 50% in the early 20th century. and it survived when your only news from a handful of paper broadsheets and radio stations controlled by press barons. the problems we have now are definitely problems but they are not entirely new, just a different kind.
there have always been ideologues and fascists. what has played into their hands is refusing to allow very common and very popular concerns to a part of moderate political discussion. when a good proportion of immigrant muslims will express a desire for homosexuality to be illegal* and also express a willingness to stay silent when others support terrorism* then wanting their to be some discerement at the border is surely something that should be discussed. instead we fret over the kneejerk reactions of do-gooders who cry racism. which leaves the problem unsolved and the only people talking about it the exaggeraters and fantasists of the far right.
* https://www.channel4.com/press/news/c4-survey-and-documentary-reveals-what-british-muslims-really-think (UK based)
The world is trending towards atheism bud.
this really doesn't have anything to do with the concerns caused by a minority of culturally conservative islamists
the same people who don’t like the conservative values that stem from Christianity or Catholicism
it's ok to dislike religious fascism in all its forms though? right? one might take the view that it's ok to limit it coming from abroad as it's hardly going to improve the situation.
It’s just smoke screen for blatant racism and xenophobia
this is patronising. there are racists and there are xenophobes and there are people who would prefer that immigration be slower or just less. these are overlapping groups of people but they are not the same. by making it impossible for moderate politicians to talk about immigration control on the basis of values, it leaves only the more exteme ideologues
I bet if we looked at immigration statistics for the US
we are talking about Europe..
but I’m probably more likely agnostic at this point. Now tell me what my values are?
are you homophobic? do you think being gay should be illegal? think gay teachers should be fired? want to see sharia law implemented? support violence against people for drawing offensive cartoons? stay silent when others express support for terrorism? i expect you would answer 'no' to most of this. it is not unreasonable to express some discernment over people who would answer 'yes' to any of these when they are seeking to enter the country.
Immigrants bring skilled labor that societies need to survive
the necessity of immigration is a consequence of class warfare. only immigrants will accept the poor conditions fostered by neglect of the working class. global capitalists want to shift workforces wherever it is profitable, urban elites agree because it's unfashionable to express any discernment over an immigrant's values. meanwhile it's the working class whose struggle is masked by all this and who bear the brunt of social problems when immigrants are funneled into underequiped areas of the country.
Have you been formally diagnosed by a psychiatrist or other qualified healthcare professional?
Undoubtedly ADHD (especially ADD variant) went underreported for a very long time as until only relatively recently we'd have blamed its symptoms on other things. The increase in people being diagnosed is real.
But it needs to be done by a qualified professional because some ADHD symptoms overlap with other neurodiversity or other conditions. So a portion of self diagnosed people will, in fact, not have ADHD but something else.
To my recollection, this feeling happens every January. I've seen posts like this for years and years. January is known as the most depressing month. Many people fast from alcohol in January. Maybe fast from media til 1st Feb? I don't know if it'll make you feel good. It might make you feel less bad?