Why? It IS about my aesthetic preferences :)I like when everywhere in a place is different and memorable. If you like samey grids I have no reason not to respect that, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
If we put it like that, every other energy source on earth begins that way and adds at least one conversion step. ... except for fusion of course.
Solar cells, technically. boiling water systems have a thermal efficiency of ~40% Solar cells are closer to 45% efficient
the idea is that to get to be the one spraying, you have to know first hand how much pain you are inflicting.
This is just plain false. There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.the largest ones we've managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html
Yeah its about quantum systems interacting, not sentient beings watching.still pretty mystical though in my book!
I mean, yeah, having good control and a sane culture around it, you couldn't reach USA's sheer number if you tried.
oh, well, luckily its not illegal for researchers in the rest of the world to study gun violence in America.
yeah I think the real world is more complicated. Like, its not just about numbers, but also how control is implemented and even culture.
notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA, the correlation is really not that strong.dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.image
Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.No it doesn't negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.Cry me a river.great argument.
... except in 100, when it doesn't, except again in 400, then it does.