There are still people with (varying degrees of) ADHD that are both normally successful or wildly successful. They did this likely not despite their ADHD but because of it. They probably grew up in an environment that allowed them to find a positive outlet for themselves so they achieved behavioral patterns that utilized it to drive them forward instead of it getting in the way.
I mean...ADHD or not, your life is generally in your own hands, both successes and failures are your "fault". The ADHD doesn't take the responsibility, it only adds context.
Is there any technical reason it cannot be done in a privacy respecting manner? It should be possible to collect a location and speed from a phone with absolutely no other data attached from the device and store this in a database. This would provide a database of anonymous traffic density in a state of flux. You cannot see which phone is which data point, where it is coming from or where it is going to.
The only real reason I can see this is not done is surveillance capitalism.
But why muddy the terminology, when there is already a clear distinction between the two major factions? where CAD isused to denote the traditionally engineering oriented, and 3D modeling is for the traditionally organic model design tool, do you need to mix the two? They each serve distinct specialized purposes and their definition are widely recognized within industry in general already.
Well, yeah a computer is obviously used but you're using it in an extremely literal sense that people generally don't use. Blender and similar are usually referred to as 3D modelling software. The key difference seems to be that 3D modeling software is not intended for precise real-world dimension but more organic shape manipulation and CAD software is meant for precise dimentioned designs made from extruded 2D sketches.
What is wrong with the first one in the top-left? It seems to be factually correct; yes you can cook Chihuahua meat in a microwave, just make sure it is properly cooked so you don't eat it raw.
I mean, pattern recognition in insanely large datasets is exactly what AI systems we have today are good at, which is also what the article talks about, and the issues and risks this poses in a war. yes, in a military context it enables tactical decisions to be made faster, and war kills people so not really a big eye opener there, however still horrible.
But this ability to analyze datasets that are basically too large for humans to efficiently condense to something meaningful is still valuable in many other aspect outside of military, killing and surveillance (although this is where it is used most extensively it seems)
The daughter references the mother visiting her, indicating she is living alone. That's a somewhat decent indicator for adulthood, at least in most cultures.
They'll subsidize cheap locked down thin clients that can do jack shit by themselves except make an RDP connection to a VM.