as someone who bats for the other team, the combination of your faction's hegemonic ubiquity and your more limited conceptions of heroism makes it really easy to read your literature from our perspective in order to gain spiritual insight and inspiration
for example Milton's Lucifer in Paradise Lost taught me great lessons on what it means to stand up again when all seems lost
Sorry, here's plainer language. Driverless cars are a public menace. People who hail them contribute to the acceptance of that public menace. As a reader, I do not find myself compelled to sympathy for your article's protagonist. I stay away from places like California's metro areas, because I do not want to participate in social experiments about me being run over by driverless vehicles.
I hope this has clarified my meaning for you and a lighthearted fuck you right back for posting this propaganda, you corpo-brained parrot.
Some guys were annoying/sexist to her while she participated in a public menace and I guess this is supposed to mean something to me beyond "stay away from California"
What you are describing are human tendencies towards pro-social activity and cultural creation. Attributing them to the crappy hegemonic stories pushed by authoritarians and conquerors (all the pictured religions in the meme fall into this category) gives those crappy, boring, often antisocial stories more credit than they deserve.
Unless you have some really good examples for how a story about how some gimp-fet deity like Jesus or a family-abandoner like Siddhartha are foundational to, say, deconstructing global imperialism? Can I learn how to deconstruct global imperialism from Jesus, who suggested placating and appeasing violent imperialists? Is that "objectively good" to you?
whether a belief is a "delusion" or not has a lot more to do with whether it is socially convenient to those immediately surrounding you and a lot less to do with factual truth
if you're telling me that there's a compromised candidate who isn't pursuing the stated goals of their party or the best interests of their voter base, I- I- I-'d I'd have to cock an eye at you and wonder what your agenda was fella
pure nonsense, imagine
just glad my party isn't one of those, whichever one that's convenient for the reader
No clue what you're talking about at this point. I am talking about real tech that is currently deployed in middle America. I am not talking about pretend or fiction or MI-6 or whatever. Please.
Corporations are driven by people — they aren’t completely autonomous agents. Yet if you shot the CEO of Exxon or any of the others, what effect would it have? Another person of much the same ilk would swiftly move into place, much as stepping on a few ants hardly effects an anthill at all.
I've never understood why people feel compelled to share this take.
Edit, clarity: The quoted common rhetorical statement, not the overall essay's conclusions about AI.
This is amazing, now there will be achievements on Steam to prove that nobody on Lemmy is good at this gem of classic gaming