Aatube

@ Aatube @kbin.melroy.org

Posts

268
Comments

2696
Joined

2 yr. ago

[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others' words. Weird, isn't it?
Formerly on kbin.social and thriv.social, now on dbzer0 or piefed.social

Moderating

Uplifting News lemmy.world

4w ago

Deleted Locked

Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators? Analysis inside
Jump
Aatube @kbin.melroy.org 4w ago
yeah that's exactly why i don't think the attitude score helps

4w ago

Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators? Analysis inside

that's how it is by default for some reason. i haven't added to me dictionary either and that's how it shows in libreoffice calc. it seems like it just doesn't squiggly any "word" with numbers in it.

flippant antagonism is the worst thing against discourse on the fediverse and we can do our part

Another researcher, Davi Ottenheimer, pointed out that the security section (Section 3, pages 47-53) of Anthropic's 244-page documentation "contains no count of zero-days at all. With no CVE list, no CVSS distribution, no severity bucket, no disclosure timeline, no vendor-confirmed-novel table, no false-positive rate."

excerpts from the summary of the post linked in "Devanash ultimately concluded", a lot of which Register repeats (which I think is a good thing since the copyediting makes the language a lot more accessible and wide-reaching and of course it was credited):

The bugs are real. 17-year-old FreeBSD RCE, 23-year-old Linux kernel heap overflow, 27-year-old OpenBSD TCP flaw. LLMs catch these because they can reason about the gap between what code does and what the developer intended. Fuzzers and static analysis literally cannot do this.
The coverage is wrong on almost every detail. The “181 Firefox exploits” ran with the browser sandbox ( yes, the thing that stops browser exploits) off. The FreeBSD exploit transcript shows substantial human guidance, not autonomy. The “thousands of severe vulnerabilities” extrapolates from 198 manually reviewed reports. The Linux kernel bug was found by Opus 4.6, the public model, not Mythos.
The moat is thinner than anyone reported. AISLE tested eight models including a 3.6B model at $0.11/M tokens. All eight found the FreeBSD bug. Mythos’s actual lead is in multi-step exploit development, not detection. That’s a narrower and more replicable advantage than what’s being sold.